Facts:

• Francisco I. Chavez, a licensed gun owner, filed a petition against the implementation of the "Guidelines in the Implementation of the Ban on the Carrying of Firearms Outside of Residence."
• These guidelines were issued on January 31, 2003, by Hermogenes E. Ebdane, Jr., the Chief of the Philippine National Police (PNP).
• The guidelines followed a directive from President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who called for a nationwide gun ban to address escalating crime rates.
• President Arroyo instructed the PNP Chief to suspend the issuance of Permits to Carry Firearms Outside of Residence (PTCFOR).
• Chavez's request for reconsideration was denied by the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).
• Consequently, Chavez filed the petition against Ebdane, Executive Secretary Alberto G. Romulo, and Gerry L. Barias, Chief of the PNP-Firearms and Explosives Division.
• Chavez contended that the President and the PNP Chief lacked the authority to impose a gun ban and revoke existing permits, arguing it violated constitutional rights and due process.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

1. The PNP Chief is authorized to issue the assailed Guidelines.
2. The right to bear arms is not a constitutional right but a statutory privilege.
3. The revocation of the petitioner's PTCFOR does not violate his right to property.
4. The issuance of the assailed Guid...(Unlock)

Ratio:

1. Authority of the PNP Chief

   • The Supreme Court determined that the PNP Chief is duly authorized to issue the guidelines based on historical delegation of licensing power from the Governor-General to the Chief of the Constabulary, now the PNP Chief.
   • This authority is reinforced by Presidential Decree No. 1866 and Republic Act No. 6975, which empower the PNP Chief to issue rules and regulations for effective firearm law implementation.

2. Right to Bear Arms

   • The Court clarified that under the 1987 Philippine Constitution, the right to bear arms is not a constitutional right but a statutory privilege.
   • Unlike the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Philippine Constitution does not guarantee an individual right to bear arms.
   • The possession of firearms in the Philippines is governed by statutory laws such as Act No. 1780, Act No. 2711, and P.D. No. 1866.

3. Vested Property Right

   • The Court ruled that a PTCFOR is not a property right protected by the Constitution.
   • A license to carry firearms is a mere privilege that can be revoked at any time.
   • Previous rulings have established that a license is not a contract or property right but a permit subject to conditions imposed by the state.

4. Police Power

   • The Court upheld the guidelines as a valid exercise of police power, stressi...continue reading