Case Digest (G.R. No. 130716)
Facts:
Francisco I. Chavez v. Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) and Magtanggol Gunigundo, G.R. No. 130716, December 09, 1998, the Supreme Court First Division, Panganiban, J., writing for the Court. Petitioner Francisco I. Chavez (a citizen, taxpayer and former government official) sought to enjoin the PCGG and its chairman Magtanggol Gunigundo from privately entering into, perfecting or executing any agreement with the heirs of Ferdinand E. Marcos concerning alleged ill‑gotten wealth, and to compel public disclosure of all negotiations, agreements and related documents; intervenors Gloria, Celnan, Scarlet and Teresa Jopson later sought to protect their asserted claims against the Marcos estate.The petition arose after September 1997 news reports alleging discovery of billions in Swiss accounts linked to the Marcoses and reporting that the government, through the PCGG, had struck a compromise with the Marcos heirs. Petitioner anchored his suit on the constitutional right of the people to information (Art. III, Sec. 7) and the state policy of full public disclosure of transactions involving public interest (Art. II, Sec. 28), asserting that any settlement would affect the national interest and the public treasury.
Attached to the petition were two instruments dated December 28, 1993: a General Agreement and a Supplemental Agreement between the PCGG and the Marcos heirs. Significant provisions included inventory and disclosure obligations by the Marcos heirs; a provision exempting retained assets from taxation; a waiver by the heirs of interest in certain Swiss deposits; a clause submitting agreements to the President for approval (Item No. 8); and, in the Supplemental Agreement, an entitlement of the heirs to 25% of the $356 million Swiss deposits (less recovery expenses).
Respondents did not deny the agreements but argued the petition was premature and that the agreements had not become effective because (among other reasons) they lacked presidential ratification and the Marcos heirs had not complied with obligations such as inventory submission. The Marcos heirs had also filed the purported agreements in Sandiganbayan Civil Case No. 0141 for approval; the Republic opposed such approval. Then‑President Fidel V. Ramos issued a memorandum (May 4, 1998) stating he had not authorized the PCGG to approve the agreements and would have disapproved them.
Acting on petitioner’s motion, the Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order dated March 23, 1998 enjoining respondents from executing any agreement with the Marcos heirs relating to their alleged ill‑gotten wealth. Oral argument was held on March 16, 1998. On August 19, 1998 the Jopsons moved to intervene; the Court granted ...(Subscriber-Only)
Issues:
- Does petitioner have legal standing to file this original action to compel disclosure and enjoin implementation of any compromise between the PCGG and the Marcos heirs?
- Is the Supreme Court the proper forum to entertain this original mandamus/prohibition action, or should relief be sought in the Sandiganbayan?
- Does the constitutional right of the people to information and the state policy of full public disclosure extend to the terms of government negotiations and proposed compromises prior to consummation?
- Are there legal restraints that render a compromise agreement bet...(Subscriber-Only)
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)