Title
Cereno vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 167366
Decision Date
Sep 26, 2012
A stabbing victim’s surgery was delayed due to unavailable anesthesiologists; despite stable initial condition, he died during the operation. Parents alleged negligence; Supreme Court ruled no breach of duty or causation, absolving doctors.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 167366)

Facts:

  • Emergency Admission and Initial Assessment
    • On the evening of 16 September 1995 (around 9:15 PM), Raymond S. Olavere, a stabbing victim, was brought to the Bicol Regional Medical Center (BRMC) emergency room. He was attended by Nurse Arlene Balares and Dr. Ruel Levy Realuyo, the resident emergency physician.
    • Dr. Realuyo recommended an exploratory laparotomy and requested 500 cc of type “A” blood for the operation. Raymond’s parents and uncle procured the blood from the Philippine National Red Cross.
  • Concurrent Surgeries and Delay in Operative Care
    • At about 10:30 PM, surgeons Drs. Santos Zafe and Pedro Dennis Cereno were operating on another patient (gunshot victim Charles Maluluy-on) with Dr. Rosalina Tatad as senior anesthesiologist. When another obstetric emergency arrived, Dr. Tatad left to assist, leaving no anesthesiologist available for Raymond.
    • Petitioners examined Raymond, found his blood pressure normal and minimal thoracic fluid (200–300 cc). They deferred surgery pending anesthesiologist availability. The operation on Raymond commenced only at approximately 12:15 AM of 17 September 1995, by which time 3,200 cc of blood had accumulated. Blood transfusion was delayed until 1:40 AM due to the need to control bleeding. At 1:45 AM Raymond suffered cardiac arrest and was pronounced dead at 2:30 AM; cause of death was hypovolemic shock.
  • Procedural History
    • On 25 October 1995, Raymond’s parents filed a complaint for damages against Nurse Balares, Dr. Realuyo, Dr. Cereno and Dr. Zafe.
    • On 15 October 1999, the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 22, Naga City, dismissed the case against Nurse Balares and Dr. Realuyo but found Drs. Cereno and Zafe negligent for delaying surgery and transfusion, awarding damages (death indemnity, moral and exemplary damages, attorney’s fees and costs).
    • On 21 February 2005, the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision. Petitioners filed a Rule 45 petition for review on certiorari before the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether petitioners Drs. Cereno and Zafe were grossly negligent in performing their duties.
  • Whether BRMC is an indispensable party subsidiarily liable for damages.
  • Whether the awards of moral and exemplary damages and attorney’s fees are excessive or exorbitant.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.