Title
Cebu Oxygen and Acetylene Co., Inc. vs. Bercilles
Case
G.R. No. L-40474
Decision Date
Aug 29, 1975
In the case of Cebu Oxygen & Acetylene Co., Inc. v. Bercilles, the Supreme Court ruled that a portion of an abandoned road in Cebu City can be registered as private property since it was withdrawn from public use and subsequently sold through a public bidding.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-40474)

Facts:

  • Cebu Oxygen & Acetylene Co., Inc. applied for the registration of title over a portion of M. Borces Street, Mabolo, Cebu City.
  • The City Council of Cebu declared the street abandoned through Resolution No. 2193 on October 3, 1968, as it was not included in the Cebu Development Plan.
  • On December 19, 1968, the City Council passed Resolution No. 2755, authorizing the Acting City Mayor to sell the land through public bidding.
  • Cebu Oxygen & Acetylene Co., Inc. was the highest bidder and was awarded the lot.
  • A deed of absolute sale was executed by the Acting City Mayor on March 3, 1969, for P10,800.00 in favor of the petitioner.
  • The petitioner filed an application with the Court of First Instance of Cebu to register its title.
  • The Assistant Provincial Fiscal of Cebu filed a motion to dismiss on June 26, 1974, arguing the property was a public road intended for public use and part of the public domain.
  • The trial court dismissed the application on October 11, 1974.
  • The petitioner sought a review from the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court set aside the trial court's order dismissing the petitioner's application for registration of title.
  • The trial court was directed ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that under the Revised Charter of Cebu City, the City Council has legislative power to close any city road, street, or alley.
  • Property withdrawn from public servitude may be used or conveyed as other real property belonging to the city.
  • This power was affirmed in the Favis vs. City of Baguio case, recognizing the city council's authority to determine if a property is necessary for public use.
  • Judicial interference is not warranted unless there is a c...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.