Title
Canas vs. Castigador
Case
G.R. No. 139844
Decision Date
Dec 15, 2000
The Supreme Court overturned the contempt ruling against Atty. Salome D. Cañas, highlighting the necessity for clear orders and adherence to proper contempt procedures in upholding judicial decorum.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 139844)

Facts:

  • Atty. Salome D. CaAas filed a petition against Hon. Lerio C. Castigador and Prosecutor Onofre M. Maranan regarding a temporary restraining order and writ of preliminary injunction.
  • The case arose from a vehicular accident on May 1, 1996, involving a Mitsubishi Lancer and an Isuzu truck.
  • A criminal complaint was filed against Nestor V. Guevarra for reckless imprudence on May 20, 1996.
  • Atty. CaAas, representing the truck owner, filed a motion for the release of the vehicle, promising to produce Guevarra for bail on May 23, 1996.
  • She arrived late on May 23 due to traffic and left a note for the judge.
  • A warrant for Guevarra's arrest was issued on July 17, 1996, and the judge recalled the release order on August 14, 1996, but Atty. CaAas did not receive the order due to an incorrect address.
  • Prosecutor Maranan filed a motion for contempt against Atty. CaAas on September 26, 1996, without providing her a copy.
  • Atty. CaAas did not attend the hearing on October 8, 1996, due to the same address issue.
  • On December 5, 1996, Atty. CaAas was found guilty of indirect contempt and fined P100 with a 30-day imprisonment.
  • The Court of Appeals upheld the contempt order, prompting Atty. CaAas to file a petition for review.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals' decision and the contempt order against Atty. CaAas.
  • The motion to dec...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the judge acted improperly in citing Atty. CaAas for indirect contempt.
  • The Court emphasized that contempt powers should be exercised with restraint and not out of vindictiveness.
  • The judge's actions indicated personal hostility rather than a commitment to uphold court dignity.
  • Contempt proceedings are criminal and require strict adherence to procedural rules, includin...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.