Title
Cabello vs. Sandiganbayan
Case
G.R. No. 93885
Decision Date
May 14, 1991
A postmaster was convicted of intentional malversation of public funds for failing to account for over P160,000, affirming that conviction is valid regardless of discrepancies between charged and proven modes of malversation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 93885)

Facts:

  • Felix H. Cabello served as the postmaster of San Juan, Southern Leyte.
  • An audit covering August 29, 1984, to May 28, 1985, revealed a shortage of public funds amounting to P160,905.63.
  • Cabello was required to return the missing funds or provide a written explanation within seventy-two hours but failed to do so.
  • He faced charges of malversation of public funds under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code, accused of willfully misappropriating the funds for personal use.
  • Cabello was arraigned on May 4, 1989, and pleaded not guilty.
  • The Sandiganbayan found him guilty, sentencing him to an indeterminate penalty of ten years and one day to eighteen years, eight months, and one day of reclusion temporal, along with perpetual special disqualification, a fine of P160,905.63, and an order to indemnify the government for the same amount.
  • Cabello filed a petition for review, arguing insufficient evidence for intentional malversation.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied Cabello's petition and affirmed the Sandiganbayan's judgment, upholding his con...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Under Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code, a public officer is guilty of malversation if he misappropriates public funds or fails to account for them upon demand.
  • The failure to produce public funds creates a prima facie presumption of personal use.
  • Cabello's list of expenditures did not sufficiently rebut this presumption, especially since he did not make restitution or provide a satisfactory explanation for the missing funds.
  • Malversation can occur through intentional acts or negligenc...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.