Title
Cabanlig vs. Sandiganbayan
Case
G.R. No. 148431
Decision Date
Jul 28, 2005
Police officer acquitted after shooting detainee who grabbed a rifle, ruled as justified fulfillment of duty to prevent escape and ensure safety.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 148431)

Facts:

  • Parties and Case Background
    • Petitioner: SPO2 Ruperto Cabanlig, a police officer.
    • Respondents: Sandiganbayan and Office of the Special Prosecutor.
    • Case: Criminal Case No. 19436 for homicide filed against Cabanlig together with co-accused SPO1 Carlos Padilla, PO2 Meinhart Abesamis, SPO2 Lucio Mercado, and SPO1 Rady Esteban.
    • Incident Date and Place: September 28, 1992, Municipality of Penaranda, Nueva Ecija.
  • Facts Leading to the Shooting
    • A robbery occurred on September 24, 1992. Police apprehended suspects Jordan Magat, Randy Reyes, and Jimmy Valino.
    • Items stolen were mostly recovered except a flower vase and a small radio, whereabouts unknown to two suspects but allegedly moved by Valino.
    • Cabanlig decided to bring Valino (instead of Magat and Reyes) to retrieve the missing items, accompanied by four policemen including himself, Padilla, Mercado, Abesamis, and Esteban.
    • Around 6:30 p.m., the policemen, all armed and in uniform, escorted Valino in a police Isuzu pickup jeep with a rear compartment featuring two bench seats. Valino was not handcuffed.
  • The Incident During Transport
    • After crossing a railway bridge on a bumpy road, Valino grabbed Mercado's M16 Armalite rifle when Mercado momentarily tried to scratch his head.
    • Valino jumped out of the moving vehicle with the M16 rifle, shouting "hoy!" was heard from Mercado.
    • Cabanlig, facing the rear, immediately fired one shot without prior warning, followed by four more shots.
    • Valino was fatally wounded with three gunshot wounds: one at the back of the head, one at the left side of the chest, and one at the left lower back.
    • The other policemen stayed with Valino's body while Cabanlig and some went to a funeral parlor.
  • Post-incident Investigation
    • SPO4 Segismundo Lacanilao of Cabanatuan Police investigated on September 29, 1992, and was told by Mercado about the "salvaging" (summary execution) of Valino.
    • Mercado later denied making such a statement.
  • Trial Court Proceedings and Rulings
    • The Sandiganbayan acquitted co-accused Padilla, Abesamis, Mercado, and Esteban for lack of evidence of conspiracy.
    • Cabanlig was convicted of homicide, sentenced to four months and two years four months imprisonment plus a P50,000 indemnity to Valino’s heirs.
    • Sandiganbayan held that Cabanlig’s shooting was not justified under self-defense or defense of a stranger but did not constitute murder due to lack of qualifying circumstances.
    • The Sandiganbayan found Cabanlig exceeded his duty by shooting without warning.
    • Associate Justice Badoy dissented, arguing that imminent danger justified the immediate shooting and acquitting Cabanlig.
    • The Sandiganbayan denied reconsideration, affirming the conviction by a 4-1 vote.

Issues:

  • Whether the Sandiganbayan erred in ruling that the defense of fulfillment of duty raised by Cabanlig was incomplete.
  • Whether the Sandiganbayan erred in ruling that Cabanlig could not invoke self-defense or defense of a stranger to justify his actions.
  • Whether the Sandiganbayan erred in sentencing Cabanlig to imprisonment and ordering payment of P50,000 to Valino’s heirs.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.