Case Digest (G.R. No. L-5028)
Facts:
In November 1952, in the Justice of the Peace Court of Basud, Camarines Norte, Felipe Cabague and his son Geronimo Cabague (plaintiffs-appellants) sued Matias Auxilio and his daughter Socorro Auxilio (defendants-appellees) for damages arising from defendants’ refusal to fulfill an oral agreement to marry Socorro to Geronimo. The complaint alleged that the Auxilios promised the marriage on condition that plaintiffs improve the family house in Basud and expend ₱700 for the wedding feast and bridal needs. Relying on this promise, plaintiffs performed the improvements and spent the stated amount. Defendants then refused to honor their pledge without cause. The Justice of the Peace Court dismissed the action, holding the oral contract unenforceable under the parol evidence rule (Rule 123, Sec. 21(c), 1935 Rules of Court). On appeal, the Court of First Instance affirmed the dismissal, leading to this appeal before the Supreme Court.
Issues:
- Can an oral agreement made in considerati
...
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-5028)
Facts:
- Parties and Context
- Plaintiffs/Appellants: Felipe Cabague and his son Geronimo Cabague.
- Defendants/Appellees: Matias Auxilio and his daughter Socorro Auxilio.
- Subject: Action for damages due to defendants’ refusal to carry out a promised marriage.
- Complaint Allegations
- Defendants promised that Socorro would marry Geronimo, provided that plaintiffs would:
- Improve the Auxilio house in Basud, Camarines Norte.
- Finance the wedding feast and the bride’s needs.
- Plaintiffs performed the improvements and expended ₱700 in reliance on the promise.
- Defendants refused to honor the promised marriage without cause, prompting this suit.
- Procedural History
- Justice of the Peace Court (Basud):
- Defendants moved to dismiss, invoking the parol‐evidence rule barring oral agreements in consideration of marriage.
- Complaint dismissed for failure to allege a written contract.
- Court of First Instance: Affirmed the dismissal on the same ground.
- Supreme Court Appeal: Plaintiffs timely appealed the order of dismissal.
Issues:
- Admissibility of Parol Evidence
- Whether the oral agreement in consideration of marriage (other than a mutual promise to marry) is admissible under the Rules of Court.
- Enforceability of the Oral Marriage Agreement
- Whether Felipe and Geronimo can enforce the defendants’ oral promise to marry by way of damages.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)