Title
Cabague vs. Auxilio
Case
G.R. No. L-5028
Decision Date
Nov 26, 1952
Plaintiffs sued defendants for breach of a marriage agreement; oral pact unenforceable, but mutual promise to marry remains actionable.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-5028)

Facts:

  • Parties and Context
    • Plaintiffs/Appellants: Felipe Cabague and his son Geronimo Cabague.
    • Defendants/Appellees: Matias Auxilio and his daughter Socorro Auxilio.
    • Subject: Action for damages due to defendants’ refusal to carry out a promised marriage.
  • Complaint Allegations
    • Defendants promised that Socorro would marry Geronimo, provided that plaintiffs would:
      • Improve the Auxilio house in Basud, Camarines Norte.
      • Finance the wedding feast and the bride’s needs.
    • Plaintiffs performed the improvements and expended ₱700 in reliance on the promise.
    • Defendants refused to honor the promised marriage without cause, prompting this suit.
  • Procedural History
    • Justice of the Peace Court (Basud):
      • Defendants moved to dismiss, invoking the parol‐evidence rule barring oral agreements in consideration of marriage.
      • Complaint dismissed for failure to allege a written contract.
    • Court of First Instance: Affirmed the dismissal on the same ground.
    • Supreme Court Appeal: Plaintiffs timely appealed the order of dismissal.

Issues:

  • Admissibility of Parol Evidence
    • Whether the oral agreement in consideration of marriage (other than a mutual promise to marry) is admissible under the Rules of Court.
  • Enforceability of the Oral Marriage Agreement
    • Whether Felipe and Geronimo can enforce the defendants’ oral promise to marry by way of damages.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.