Title
Bureau of Internal Revenue vs. TICO Insurance Co., Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 204226
Decision Date
Apr 18, 2022
Dispute over condominium units: Glowide and PMI's 2000 levy predates BIR's 2005 tax lien, granting superior rights. SC affirms CA ruling.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 204226)

Facts:

  • Parties and Background
    • TICO Insurance Company, Inc. – life insurer placed under liquidation by the Insurance Commission on April 22, 2002.
    • Glowide Enterprises, Inc. and Pacific Mills, Inc. – policyholders under a 1997 fire insurance policy covering Condominium Units 7A & 7B of Trafalgar Plaza (CCT Nos. 39452 & 39453).
  • Glowide & PMI’s Insurance Claim
    • A conflagration destroyed insured properties; TICO failed to pay proceeds despite demand. Glowide & PMI sued in RTC Quezon City (Q-00-42328), obtained on October 3, 2001 a judgment for ₱5,442,209.97 plus interest, attorney’s fees, and costs.
    • RTC QC granted preliminary attachment (notice of levy on attachment annotated December 22, 2000); upon motion for execution, writ issued June 3, 2002; certificate of sale issued April 15, 2004; final deed of sale executed April 15, 2005 after redemption period lapsed.
  • BIR’s Tax Assessment and Lien
    • On January 31, 2000 the BIR served TICO final deficiency assessments (1996–1997) totaling ₱73,020,590.12, reduced to ₱69,479,440.59 after protest, which remained unpaid.
    • The BIR issued a warrant of distraint/levy and notice of tax lien on TICO’s properties; lien was annotated on CCT Nos. 39452 & 39453 on February 15, 2005.
  • Interpleader Proceedings and Prior Rulings
    • On August 7, 2006 TICO filed an interpleader in RTC Makati (SC 06-667) to determine whether the BIR or Glowide & PMI had superior right over the units. RTC Makati on March 25, 2008 held BIR’s claim preferred; motion for reconsideration denied July 19, 2008.
    • The Court of Appeals on December 16, 2011 reversed, finding Glowide & PMI’s attachment/execution rights (retroactive to December 22, 2000) superior to the BIR’s lien (annotated February 15, 2005); CA denied BIR’s motion for reconsideration October 22, 2012. BIR then elevated the case to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Whether the BIR’s petition should be dismissed on technical grounds for untimely filing of a motion for reconsideration.
  • Whether TICO’s interpleader complaint was improper as a collateral attack on a final and executory judgment in favor of Glowide & PMI.
  • Which party—BIR or Glowide & PMI—has the superior claim over the condominium units.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.