Title
Blue Manila, Inc. vs. Jamias
Case
G.R. No. 230919
Decision Date
Jan 20, 2021
Seafarer Jamias, diagnosed with a herniated disc during employment, was awarded $80K in disability benefits after the Supreme Court ruled his ailment compensable under POEA-SEC, deeming it permanent due to the company doctor's incomplete assessment.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 230919)

Facts:

  • Parties and employment relationship
    • Petitioners Blue Manila, Inc. (Blue Manila) and/or Oceanwide Crew Manila, Inc. are the former and present manning agents of Wagenborg Crewmanagement BV (Wagenborg), owner of the vessel M/V Kwintebank.
    • Respondent Antonio R. Jamias worked for petitioners since 1998.
    • In February 2011, Jamias was rehired as Cook AB by Blue Manila under a 6-month contract covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) between Associated Marine Officers’ and Seamen’s Union of the Philippines and Wagenborg.
    • Jamias passed the mandatory Pre-Employment Medical Examination (PEME) and then boarded M/V Kwintebank.
  • Jamias’s duties and alleged onset of ailments
    • As a cook, Jamias claimed that he was tasked to: prepare and cook food (including desserts and pies); maintain cleanliness in work areas, equipment, kitchen tools, and cold rooms; clean, wash, and paint the gallery, kitchen, and store rooms, as well as sweep garbage disposed from freezers daily; receive food stores or provisions delivery and bring them into walk-in freezers; paint and chip rust on deck and superstructure; serve as deckhand on various repairs and maintenance works; and perform other work required by his superiors.
    • Jamias stated that his duties involved constant strenuous manual work such as pushing, lifting, and carrying heavy provisions on board the vessel.
    • In August 2011, while doing his usual work, Jamias alleged that he experienced a bout of coughing that triggered pain in his umbilical area.
    • Jamias further alleged that while lifting two sacks of potatoes, he felt excruciating pain as if something snapped at his waist area.
    • Jamias rested until the pain subsided before finishing the task of carrying food provisions.
    • A few days later, Jamias complained of abdominal pain in the umbilical area with pain extending to his left side.
    • The ship captain ordered that Jamias be brought to Telemark Hospital in Norway, where he was diagnosed with constipation and umbilical hernia.
    • Upon recommendation of the offshore doctor, Jamias was signed off the vessel.
    • Jamias was repatriated to Manila on August 24, 2011, and was admitted at Manila Doctor’s Hospital.
  • Post-repatriation medical events and surgery
    • On August 25, 2011, the company-designated doctor ordered Jamias to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine.
    • The Radiographic Report reflected:
      • Disc desiccation and diffuse disc bulge with focal broad-based central disc protrusion causing mild central canal and mild left foraminal stenoses, L5-S1.
      • Degenerative osseous changes.
    • On September 24, 2011, Jamias underwent surgery for his umbilical hernia, which cleared up his abdominal pain.
    • Despite relief from abdominal pain, Jamias claimed that his lower back pain persisted.
    • The company-designated physician dismissed the lower back pain as attributable to aging and declared Jamias fit-to-work as of November 12, 2011.
  • Subsequent complaints, medical consultations, and disability demand
    • Jamias requested medical evaluation for his back pain at the local manning office.
    • Jamias alleged that the manning agent told him to submit himself to PEME on November 15, 2011.
    • In January 2012, Jamias wrote two letters asking petitioners to evaluate his back condition, but petitioners did not reply.
    • Jamias then consulted Dr. Renato P. Runas, an orthopedic specialist.
    • Dr. Runas declared Jamias’s lower back pain due to the presence of a “central broad-based disc herniation”, a Grade 8 disability under the POEA-Contract.
    • Dr. Runas described the impediment as moderate rigidity or 2/3 loss of motion or lifting power of the trunk.
    • Dr. Runas opined that because Jamias’s job as cook involved carrying heavy provisions and food supplies, the impediment rendered him unfit to resume work on board the vessel.
    • Jamias resorted to Voluntary Arbitration and demanded payment of disability benefits from petitioners.
    • Petitioners refused, asserting no liability for the back ailment.
  • Petitioners’ position in arbitration
    • Petitioners asserted that prior to repatriation in August 2011, Jamias only complained of abdominal pain, not back pain.
    • Petitioners stated that offshore diagnosis was constipation and umbilical hernia, and those conditions were medically resolved after the September 2011 surgery.
    • Petitioners argued that Jamias never complained about back pain during the time he was under the care of the company-designated physician.
    • Petitioners contended that Jamias also failed to disclose the supposed existence of his back ailment in his subsequent PEME in November 2011.
    • Petitioners argued that these circumstances freed them from liability for Jamias’s subsequently acquired back illness.
  • Third-doctor examination and medical findings
    • The Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators (PVA) of the National Conciliation and Mediation Board, Department of Labor and Employment ordered Jamias to submit himself to an examination by a third doctor.
    • The parties were required to submit three names of qualified physicians, and both parties chose Dr. Samuel M. Grozman.
    • The issue for Dr. Grozman was limited to whether Jamias’s broad-based herniated disc at L5-S1 causing low back pain was a necessary consequence or even remotely related to the umbilical hernia that had already been medically resolved.
    • Dr. Grozman issued a medical certificate dated August 2, 2013, stating that:
      • Jamias reported low back pain since August 2011.
      • On examination, Jamias had severe limitation of truncal flexion and extension.
      • Both lower extremities graded 5/5, with equivocal straight leg raising.
      • Dr. Grozman’s impression was low back pain with radiculopathy to degenerative disc disease L5-S1.
      • Dr. Grozman confirmed diagnosis with repeat MRI and EMG NCV.
      • Dr. Grozman stated there was no reported literature of umbilical hernia causing broad-based herniated disc.
    • After consideration of Dr. Grozman’s report and the parties’ pleadings, the PVA rendered an Award in favor of Jamias.
  • PVA Award
    • The PVA directed petitioners Blue Manila, Inc. and/or Oceanwide Crew Manila, Inc. to jointly and severally pay Jamias US$80,000.00 or its peso equivalent at the time of payment as disability benefits, plus 10% as attorney’s fees.
    • The PVA dismissed all other claims for lack of merit.
  • Court of Appeals proceedings
    • Petitioners appealed the PVA Award and the order dated December 26, 2013 denying their motion for reconsideration.
    • In its September 9, 2016 Decision, the Court of Appeals (CA) ruled that:
      • Although Jamias was medically repatriated because of umbilical hernia, petitioners could not deny that Jamias also complained of back ailment.
      • Within three days after repatriation, the company-designated physician examined Jamias and immediately ordered an MRI.
      • The MRI results showed disc dessication and diffuse disc bulge with focal broad-based central disc protusion causing mild central canal and mild left foraminal stenoses, L5-S1.
      • The MRI belied petitioners’ claim that Jamias complained of back ailment only after the employment contract or only when he sought medical reassessment in January 2012.
      • It was erroneous for the PVA to limit the third doctor’s determination to whether the broad-based herniated disc at L5-S1 was a necessary consequence or remotely related to the umbilical hernia.
      • The third doctor’s evaluation failed to satisfy the standard under the POEA-Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) and the CBA in assessing the seafarer’s true condition.
      • Since the third doctor failed to provide the corres...(Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.