Title
Beso vs. Daguman
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-99-1211
Decision Date
Jan 28, 2000
Judge Juan Daguman was found guilty of non-feasance in office for solemnizing a marriage outside his jurisdiction and failing to register the marriage contract, resulting in a fine of P5,000.00 and a stern warning from the Court.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. MTJ-99-1211)

Facts:

  • Zenaida S. Beso filed a complaint against Judge Juan Daguman of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) of Sta. Margarita-Tarangan-Pagsanjan, Samar.
  • The complaint was for non-feasance in office.
  • On August 28, 1997, Judge Daguman solemnized the marriage of Beso and Bernardito A. Yman at his residence in Calbayog City, outside his judicial jurisdiction.
  • The ceremony was attended by Pacifico Maghacot (principal sponsor) and spouses Ramon and Teresita Dean.
  • Beso later discovered that the marriage was not registered with the Local Civil Registrar.
  • Upon inquiry, Judge Daguman informed Beso that all copies of the marriage contract were taken by Yman.
  • Beso alleged that the judge's actions were prejudicial to her interests due to the solemnization outside his jurisdiction and negligence in not retaining a copy and not registering the marriage.
  • The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) investigated and found Judge Daguman guilty of non-feasance in office, recommending a fine of P5,000.00.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. Yes, Judge Juan Daguman committed non-feasance in office by solemnizing a marriage outside his jurisdiction.
  2. Yes, Judge Daguman was negligent in failing to...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court ruled that Judge Daguman's actions constituted non-feasance in office.
  • Articles 7 and 8 of the Family Code state that a marriage may be solemnized by any incumbent member of the judiciary within the court's jurisdiction.
  • Exceptions to this rule include situations where either party is at the point of death, the place of marriage is in a remote area, or there is a written sworn request from both parties.
  • None of these exceptions applied in this case.
  • The judge's justification of acting in good faith due to the urgency of Beso&...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.