Title
Hernald Bermillo y De Vera vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 246434
Decision Date
Jan 24, 2024
Bermillo was accused of drug possession after a buy-bust operation. The court found failures in chain of custody, leading to his acquittal.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 246434)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charges
    • Hernald Bermillo y de Vera (petitioner) was charged with possession of dangerous drugs under Section 11, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165.
    • The Information alleged that on or about March 21, 2015, around 5:35 PM, in Camiling, Tarlac, Bermillo possessed one heat-sealed transparent plastic sachet containing 0.019 gram of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride (shabu).
  • Arrest and Buy-Bust Operation
    • A confidential agent informed Police Senior Inspector Manolito S. Jandoc about Vilma Matias's illegal drug dealings.
    • A buy-bust operation was organized with PO1 Mark Anthony Alviar as the poseur-buyer and other police officers as back-up.
    • Matias and Bermillo arrived together; PO1 Alviar gave marked money to Matias, who gave him a sachet of shabu.
    • Upon arresting Matias, police observed Bermillo drawing and trying to throw a sachet, which was seized.
    • Both were taken to the police station; seized items marked and inventoried in presence of barangay official, a media representative, and DOJ representative.
  • Forensic Examination
    • Seized items brought to PNP Crime Laboratory for forensic chemistry examination.
    • Police Forensic Chemist Angelito Angel conducted tests, confirming the presence of methamphetamine hydrochloride.
  • Defense's Version
    • Bermillo and Matias contended they were on their way home from butchering a pig and denied illegal possession.
    • Police allegedly showed them shabu to coerce admission; no illegal items were found in the initial frisk.
  • Trial Court and Appeals
    • RTC of Camiling found Bermillo guilty beyond reasonable doubt and imposed an indeterminate prison term of 12 years 8 months to 17 years 8 months plus a fine of Php300,000.
    • CA affirmed the conviction, ruling the chain of custody was properly observed.
    • Motion for reconsideration by Bermillo denied by CA.
    • Petition for review filed before the Supreme Court, which also initially denied the petition.
  • Motion for Reconsideration before the Supreme Court
    • Bermillo challenged the validity of his arrest and the chain of custody of the seized drugs.
    • Argued absence of probable cause for warrantless arrest and unconstitutional warrantless search.

Issues:

  • Whether the warrantless arrest of petitioner Bermillo in flagrante delicto was valid.
  • Whether the prosecution satisfactorily established the unbroken chain of custody of the seized methamphetamine hydrochloride under Section 21 of RA 9165, as amended by RA 10640.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.