Title
Benito vs. Securities and Exchange Commission
Case
G.R. No. L-56655
Decision Date
Jul 25, 1983
Petitioner challenged share issuance and capital stock increase, alleging pre-emptive rights violation and lack of notice. SC upheld SEC ruling, dismissing claims as unsubstantiated.

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-56655)

Facts:

  • Incorporation and initial capitalization
    • On February 6, 1959, respondent Jamiatul Philippine-Al Islamia, Inc. (originally Kamilol Islam Institute, Inc.) filed its Articles of Incorporation with the SEC, approved December 14, 1962.
    • Authorized capital stock was ₱200,000 divided into 20,000 shares at ₱10 par; 8,058 shares (₱80,580) subscribed and fully paid. Petitioner Datu Tagoranao Benito held 460 shares (₱4,600).
  • Increase of capital and additional issuance
    • On October 28, 1975, the corporation filed a certificate increasing authorized capital from ₱200,000 to ₱1,000,000. At the November 25, 1975 stockholders’ meeting, ₱191,560 worth of shares were represented and approved. ₱110,980 of the originally unissued ₱200,000 were subsequently issued. Of the new total, ₱160,000 worth of shares were subscribed by Mrs. Ramos, Mrs. Lucman, and Moki-in Alonto.
  • Petitioner’s SEC petition and proceedings
    • On November 18, 1976, petitioner filed a petition before the SEC alleging violation of his pre-emptive rights over the ₱110,980 additional issuance and the illegality of the capital increase due to lack of notice. He prayed for cancellation of shares, registration of 2,540 shares acquired from the Alontos, and an accounting.
    • Respondents denied the allegations, asserting no cause of action and that petitioner held the certificates only as collateral for loans to the Alontos.
    • On July 11, 1980, Hearing Officer Macalalag ruled the additional issuance valid and not subject to pre-emptive rights; ordered cancellation of Alontos’ certificates and issuance of new ones to petitioner; directed compliance with annual filing; declared the 1976 trustees’ election irregular and ordered a new meeting. The SEC En Banc affirmed on March 9, 1981.
    • Petitioner then appealed to the Supreme Court, challenging (a) the validity of the 110,980-share issuance, (b) the capital increase to ₱1,000,000, and (c) his entitlement to attorneys’ fees and damages.

Issues:

  • Whether the issuance of ₱110,980 worth of previously unissued shares without stockholder consent violated petitioner’s pre-emptive rights.
  • Whether the increase in authorized capital from ₱200,000 to ₱1,000,000 without express consent or waiver of stockholders was invalid.
  • Whether petitioner is entitled to attorneys’ fees, damages, and litigation expenses in challenging the directors.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.