Title
Begay vs. Saguyod
Case
A.M. No. P-17-3652
Decision Date
Jun 23, 2020
Atty. Paulino I. Saguyod, Clerk of Court VI, is dismissed for simple misconduct due to his intimidating conduct while enforcing a writ of possession in a property dispute.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-17-3652)

Facts:

  • Complainant: Willy Fred U. Begay, owner of the Garden of Samantha Memorial Park in Paniqui, Tarlac.
  • Respondents: Atty. Paulino I. Saguyod (Clerk of Court VI) and George P. Clemente (Sheriff IV) of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 67, Paniqui, Tarlac.
  • Begay filed a case (Civil Case No. 008-13) against the Rural Bank of San Luis Pampanga, Inc. for nullification of real estate mortgages.
  • On December 2, 2014, the bank filed an ex parte motion for a writ of possession regarding a parcel of land in the memorial park, claiming ownership through an extrajudicial foreclosure sale.
  • The trial court granted the motion on April 17, 2015; Atty. Saguyod issued the writ on April 20, 2015, executed by Sheriff Clemente.
  • Begay, not a party to the foreclosure, filed a Motion to Quash the writ, asserting ownership.
  • On May 19, 2015, the respondents enforced the writ, removing Begay's security personnel and allowing the bank's representatives to occupy the property.
  • Begay claimed the security agency was unlicensed and alleged improper participation by Atty. Saguyod.
  • The trial court granted Begay's motion to quash on June 9, 2015, restoring his possession.
  • The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) recommended finding Atty. Saguyod guilty of simple misconduct; the complaint against Sheriff Clemente was dismissed.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Atty. Paulino I. Saguyod was found guilty of simple misconduct and dismissed from service, with forfeiture of retirement benefits except for accrued leave credits.
  • The compla...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court upheld the OCA's findings, stating Atty. Saguyod exceeded his authority by participating in the writ's implementation, which was not his role as he was not the designated sheriff.
  • The writ was directed to Sheriff Clemente, who was responsible for i...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.