Case Digest (G.R. No. 13952) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
On December 4, 2009, petitioners Herman Antonio M. Bascon and Antonio Villamor filed petitions before the 3rd Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) of Medellin-Daanbantayan-San Remigio, Cebu, seeking to exclude 153 private respondents from voter registration in Barangay Punta, San Remigio, Cebu, covered by precincts 0113A, 0112B, 0115B, and 0114A. Petitioners challenged respondents’ qualification as voters, alleging they were not bona fide residents of Barangay Punta but transient workers employed by the Olivar family’s fishing business. According to petitioners, respondents merely used their employer’s bunk house at the San Remigio port as temporary quarters between fishing expeditions and were actual residents of other neighboring municipalities such as Bantayan, Sta. Fe, and Madridejos. Petitioners also asserted bias since a family member of their employer was running for public office and the Election Registration Board (ERB) chairperson's son was politically allied. Res
...
Case Digest (G.R. No. 13952) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Parties and Context
- Petitioners Herman Antonio M. Bascon and Antonio Villamor filed a petition to exclude respondents, a group of 153 persons, as qualified voters of Barangay Punta, San Remigio, Cebu.
- Respondents were employees allegedly residing temporarily in their employer’s bunk house in Barangay Punta and sought to register as voters in that barangay.
- Petitioners claimed respondents were actually residents of other municipalities (Bantayan, Sta. Fe, Madridejos), and that their residency in Barangay Punta was insufficient for voter registration.
- The employer of respondents was the Olivar family, with Jay Olivar running for municipal mayor at the time.
- Proceedings in the Lower Courts
- Respondents presented certificates of employment, community tax certificates, and a certification from the Punong Barangay of Punta stating their residency.
- The Election Registration Board (ERB) of San Remigio approved respondents’ registration applications after hearing.
- The 3rd Municipal Circuit Trial Court rendered a decision denying petitioners’ exclusion petition and affirming respondents’ registration as qualified voters.
- On appeal, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 61 of Bogo, Cebu, affirmed the Municipal Circuit Trial Court’s decision in toto.
- Petitioners’ Allegations
- Petitioners asserted respondents were transient workers using the employer’s bunk house only temporarily and were not bona fide residents.
- Petitioners pointed to the familial-political connections between ERB members and the Olivar family to allege partiality and bias.
- They argued certificates of employment and tax certificates were insufficient to prove residency, and the Punong Barangay’s certification was self-serving.
- They contended that the trial courts should have conducted ocular inspection of respondents’ alleged residence.
- Respondents’ Pleas
- Respondents argued the petition for review under Rule 45 was improper, as the issues were factual, and that the ERB’s findings were conclusive and entitled to regularity presumption.
- They emphasized respondents met residency requirements and presented sufficient evidence.
- Respondents raised petitioners’ failure to attach essential records and pleadings.
Issues:
- Whether respondents, employees who temporarily reside in their employer’s bunk house in Barangay Punta, San Remigio, Cebu, may qualify as bona fide residents and register as voters in that barangay despite allegations of temporary residency and affiliation with a political candidate.
- Whether the Court may review factual findings of the Election Registration Board and the trial courts in a petition for certiorari under Rule 45.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)