Case Digest (G.R. No. 169757) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In Barangay San Roque, Talisay, Cebu v. Heirs of Francisco Pastor (G.R. No. 138896, June 20, 2000), petitioner Barangay San Roque sought to expropriate a parcel owned by respondents, the heirs of Francisco Pastor (Eugenio Sylianco, Teodoro Sylianco, Isabel Sylianco, Eugenia S. Ong, Lawrence Sylianco, Lawson Sylianco, Lawina S. Notario, Leonardo Sylianco Jr., and Lawford Sylianco). On April 8, 1997, the Municipal Trial Court (Branch 1, Talisay, Cebu) dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, holding that expropriation suits fall exclusively under the Regional Trial Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to BP 129. Undeterred, petitioner filed the same complaint before the RTC of Cebu City (Branch 58). On March 29, 1999, RTC Branch 58 likewise dismissed the case for want of jurisdiction, reasoning that the assessed value of the property was only ₱1,740—below the ₱20,000 threshold for MTC jurisdiction under Section 3(3) of R.A. 7691—and thus must be heard by the MTC. The RTC also re... Case Digest (G.R. No. 169757) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Municipal Trial Court Proceedings
- Petitioner Barangay San Roque, Talisay, Cebu filed a Complaint for Eminent Domain in MTC Talisay, Branch 1.
- On April 8, 1997, the MTC dismissed the Complaint for lack of jurisdiction, holding that expropriation suits fall within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Courts (RTCs) as actions “incapable of pecuniary estimation.”
- Regional Trial Court Proceedings
- Petitioner filed the Complaint anew in RTC Cebu City, Branch 58, which, on March 29, 1999, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The RTC held that because the assessed value of the property was ₱1,740.00 (below ₱20,000.00), the case belonged in the MTC under Section 3(3), R.A. 7691, as an action affecting title to or possession of real property.
- On May 14, 1999, the RTC denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration, reiterating its view that the assessed value governed jurisdiction.
- Supreme Court Proceedings
- Petitioner filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari before the Supreme Court, but it was initially dismissed as filed out of time (Resolution of July 28, 1999) and later reinstated (Resolution of October 6, 1999).
- The sole issue framed: “Which court, MTC or RTC, has jurisdiction over cases for eminent domain or expropriation where the assessed value of the subject property is below Twenty Thousand (₱20,000.00) Pesos?”
Issues:
- Jurisdictional Scope
- Whether expropriation (eminent domain) suits are “incapable of pecuniary estimation” and thereby fall under the exclusive original jurisdiction of RTCs pursuant to Section 19(1), Batas Pambansa Blg. 129.
- Whether the assessed monetary value of the property (below ₱20,000.00) divests the RTC of jurisdiction in favor of the MTC under Section 3(3), R.A. 7691.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)