Title
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas vs. Bool
Case
G.R. No. 207522
Decision Date
Apr 18, 2021
BSP employee Nelson Bool failed to detect misspelled surname on banknotes, leading to gross neglect of duty charges. Supreme Court upheld dismissal, rejecting mitigating factors.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 207522)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Contract for Banknote Printing
    • On August 11, 2005, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) awarded a contract to Francois Charles Oberthur Fiduciare (FCOF), a French private security printing firm, for the supply and delivery of finished banknotes.
    • The contract involved 160 million pieces of 100-Piso notes (valued at US$5,264,000.00) and 89 million pieces of 1,000-Piso notes (valued at US$2,996,000.00).
  • Invitation and BSP Representation
    • On August 17, 2005, FCOF invited BSP to send a representative to witness the printing and approve the litho and intaglio printed sheets.
    • Litho plates print the background features, while intaglio plates print embossed features such as the Philippine President’s name.
  • Appointment and Mandate of Respondent
    • On September 15, 2005, BSP authorized Nelson C. Bool to travel to Rennes, France, as BSP’s representative.
    • Bool’s task was to ensure the printed sheets met BSP’s prescribed specifications before actual production started.
  • Discovery of Error and Charges
    • On November 9, 2005, it was discovered that the surname of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on the 100-Piso notes was misspelled.
    • BSP formally charged Bool with gross neglect of duty for failing to detect this error.
  • BSP Investigation and Penalty
    • The BSP Investigation Report dated December 10, 2009, found Bool guilty of gross neglect of duty.
    • Penalty imposed by BSP was dismissal from service, forfeiture of retirement benefits, cancellation of civil service eligibility, and perpetual disqualification from government reemployment.
  • Administrative Remedies and Appeals
    • Bool filed a Motion for Reconsideration, which BSP denied on October 4, 2010.
    • He elevated the case to the Civil Service Commission (CSC).
  • Civil Service Commission’s Decision
    • On November 15, 2011, CSC affirmed BSP’s findings and penalties, adding an accessory penalty of bar from taking the Civil Service Examination.
    • CSC denied Bool’s Motion for Reconsideration in a February 1, 2012 Resolution.
  • Court of Appeals Proceedings
    • Bool filed a Petition for Review with the Court of Appeals (CA).
    • On January 21, 2013, CA partly granted the petition and modified the penalty from dismissal to suspension without pay for one year, citing mitigating circumstances.
    • CA denied BSP’s Motion for Reconsideration on May 20, 2013.
  • Supreme Court Petition for Review on Certiorari
    • BSP filed a Petition before the Supreme Court seeking to reverse the CA’s penalty modification and reinstate the dismissal penalty.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reducing the penalty imposed on Nelson C. Bool from dismissal to suspension for one year despite his guilt of gross neglect of duty.
  • Whether mitigating circumstances such as length of service, good faith, and first offense justify the reduction of penalty in a case involving gross neglect of duty characterized as a grave offense punishable by dismissal even for first-time offenders.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.