Title
Bangayan vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 235610
Decision Date
Sep 16, 2020
Rodan Bangayan acquitted of sexual abuse under RA 7610; Supreme Court ruled consent valid for 12-18-year-olds without coercion, citing AAA's voluntary relationship.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 268891)

Facts:

  • Parties and Charge
    • Petitioner: Rodan A. Bangayan y Alcaide.
    • Respondent: People of the Philippines.
    • Charge: Violation of Section 5(b), Article III of Republic Act No. 7610 (sexual intercourse with a child exploited in prostitution or subjected to other sexual abuse).
  • Incident and Victim
    • Date and Place: January 2012, Brgy. San Ramos, Nagtipunan, Quirino.
    • Victim (AAA): Born December 14, 1999; aged 12 years, 1 month at the time of the incident.
  • Evidence Presented
    • Witnesses
      • PO2 Rosalita Manilao – handled the complaint and free sworn statement of AAA.
      • BBB – AAA’s brother; saw Bangayan on top of AAA, both naked from the waist down; threatened by Bangayan.
      • Dr. Luis Villar – medico-legal examiner; found smooth hymenal edges, opening size of an index finger, and 2–3 months’ pregnancy.
    • Documents
      • Malaya at Kusang Loob na Salaysay of AAA and of BBB.
      • Medico-Legal Report and AAA’s Certificate of Live Birth.
      • Affidavit of Desistance executed by AAA at age 14, stating she and Bangayan were living as husband and wife with one child; second child born May 4, 2015.
  • Procedural History
    • RTC Decision (April 11, 2016): Convicted Bangayan of sexual abuse under RA 7610; sentenced to reclusion temporal (14 y 8 m–20 y); awarded ₱50,000 each as civil indemnity, moral and exemplary damages.
    • CA Decision (June 28, 2017): Denied appeal; affirmed conviction; increased damages to ₱75,000 each.
    • CA Resolution (October 24, 2017): Denied motion for reconsideration.
    • Supreme Court Petition filed January 5, 2018.

Issues:

  • Whether Bangayan may invoke AAA’s consent and their ongoing relationship—including the birth of two children—as a defense to the charge of sexual abuse under Section 5(b), Article III of RA 7610.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.