Title
Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co., Inc. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 81100-01
Decision Date
Feb 7, 1990
BMMC failed to fulfill its milling contract obligations after losing railway access, leading to rescission by Gatuslao; no force majeure or bad faith found.
A

Case Digest (G.R. No. 81100-01)

Facts:

  • Parties and instruments
    • Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co., Inc. (BMMC) was owner and operator of the sugar central in Bacolod City.
    • Alonso Gatuslao was a registered planter of the Bacolod-Murcia Mill District and registered owner of Lot Nos. 310, 140, 141 and 101-A (Hda. San Roque).
    • On May 24, 1957 BMMC and Alonso Gatuslao executed an Extension and Modification of Milling Contract, registered September 17, 1962 and annotated on the relevant titles.
    • The milling contracts granted BMMC rights of way across planters’ lands for the duration of the milling contracts, specified as a period of 45 years beginning with the 1920-1921 harvest.
  • Historical operation of transportation facilities
    • From crop year 1920-1921 through 1967-1968, BMMC transported planters’ canes by cane cars over a railway system traversing adherent planters’ lands.
    • BMMC constructed the railroad tracks in 1920 and used between 900 to 1,000 cane cars and ten locomotives, each pulling 30 to 50 cars with a maximum capacity of 8 tons per car.
    • The loading points for Alonso Gatuslao were at the Arimas Line, Switch 2, from which BMMC hauled his canes continuously until crop year 1967-1968.
  • Closure of railway and related litigation
    • Owners of Angela Estate, Inc. and others refused to renew their milling contracts at the end of crop year 1964-1965; their refusal caused termination of the conventional right of way across Hacienda Helvetia.
    • BMMC filed an action for legal easement and obtained an ex parte writ of preliminary injunction on October 4, 1965; the lower court maintained injunction orders in 1966.
    • The landowners petitioned the Supreme Court; on August 10, 1967 the Court issued a writ enjoining enforcement of the lower court’s injunction; the writ was temporarily lifted by agreement to allow use of the tracks through June 30, 1968 only, and automatically reinstated July 1, 1968.
    • The closure of the railway portion in Hacienda Helvetia in 1968 rendered BMMC unable to operate its cane cars and locomotives for the 1968-1969 crop year.
  • Events and communications before the 1968-1969 milling season
    • BMMC informed planters in February 1968 that trucking requirements to haul an average 3,500 tons daily at 5 tons per truck required not less than 700 loaded trucks plus 700 empties; BMMC admitted it had far fewer resources.
    • BMMC possessed initially 280 trailers, 20 tractors and 3 trucks, plus some hired trucks and permanently leased trailers to certain planters; BMMC acquired additional equipment only in October 1968.
    • BMMC’s communications to planters acknowledged the risk that milling would be greatly hampered if rights of way remained closed and suggested planters explore other solutions; planters pressed BMMC for definite plans and for a P13 million performance bond.
  • Actions of the planters and cooperative responses
    • On June 19, 1968 Agro-Industrial Development of Silay-Saravia (AIDSISA) and Bacolod-Murcia Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Association (B-M ACMA) entered into a milling contract to mill certain planters’ canes.
    • B-M ACMA organized to transport planters’ canes when BMMC could not assure adequate hauling; the cooperative hauled canes of planters, including Gatuslao, during the 1968-1969 season.
  • Pleadings and trial court judgment
    • On October 30, 1968 Alonso Gatuslao and his wife...(Subscriber-Only)

Issues:

  • Whether the closure of BMMC’s railroad lines constituted *force majeure* excusing performance.
  • Whether Alonso Gatuslao had the right to rescind the milling contract under Article 1191 of the Civil Code.
  • Whether Gatuslao was justified in violating his milling contract by milling with other centrals.
  • Whether private respondents Gatuslao and B-M A...(Subscriber-Only)

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.