Title
Bacala vs. Heirs of Polino
Case
G.R. No. 200608
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2021
Aproniana, as guardian, contested a property sale by Anecito to Juan, alleging it was fictitious. SC upheld the sale, ruling it valid with a resolutory condition, not a donation.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 174826)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Subject Property
    • Petitioner: Dioscoro Poliao Bacala, substituted judicial guardian of mentally incompetent heir Aquilino O. Poliao.
    • Respondents: Heirs of spouses Juan Poliao and Corazon Rom—Ruben R., Brendo R., Carlito R., and Bandy R. Poliao—represented by Ruben R. Poliao.
  • Transactions Contested
    • Anecito and Clara Poliao, parents of Aquilino and Ducepino (both incapacitated), owned an 80,003 sqm coconut land in Cocomon, Lupon, Davao Oriental (TCT No. T-3353).
    • On April 13, 1992, Anecito purportedly sold the land to his brother Juan for ₱15,000.00 and concurrently executed an Agreement: (a) Anecito to enjoy usufruct during his lifetime; (b) Juan to support Aquilino and Ducepino after Anecito’s death; (c) breach renders the sale nugatory.
    • While guardianship over the incapacitated heirs was pending (Special Proc. No. 237, RTC Mati), Juan executed (Feb. 23, 1996) a Deed of Voluntary Transfer of the property to his children.
  • Procedural History
    • Aproniana PoliAo Balisalisa (Judicial Guardian) filed, on Sept. 3, 1996, Civil Case No. 1863 RTC Lupon: complaint for nullity/annulment of sale and agreement, accounting, damages, fees, and injunctive relief.
    • RTC (Feb. 18, 2002) voided the 1992 Deed of Sale, Agreement, and 1996 Transfer for lack of consideration, simulation, and non-compliance with donation formalities; ordered reconveyance, accounting of harvests, and damages.
    • CA (Mar. 10, 2011 Decision; Feb. 3, 2012 Resolution) reversed and set aside the RTC decision, upholding the validity of the Deed of Sale, Agreement, and Transfer under presumption of consideration and best evidence rule.
    • Bacala’s Petition for Review on Certiorari (G.R. No. 200608) assails the CA rulings.

Issues:

  • Does gross inadequacy of the price stated in the Deed of Sale invalidate the contract of sale?
  • What is the true nature of the transaction between Anecito and Juan—sale subject to resolutory condition or donation mortis causa?
  • Are the Deed of Sale, Agreement, and Deed of Voluntary Transfer valid under the rules on contracts, evidence, and rescission?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.