Case Digest (G.R. No. 123793)
Facts:
In Associated Bank v. Court of Appeals and Lorenzo Sarmiento Jr. (G.R. No. 123793, June 29, 1998), petitioner Associated Bank (formerly Associated Banking Corporation and later Associated Citizens Bank) emerged as the surviving corporation of a September 16, 1975 merger with Citizens Bank and Trust Company (CBTC). On September 7, 1977, respondent Lorenzo Sarmiento Jr. executed Promissory Note No. TL-2649-77 in favor of CBTC for ₱2,500,000.00, payable by March 6, 1978, with a 14% annual interest rate, 3% liquidated damages, compounded interest and 10% attorney’s fees in case of litigation. After several partial payments and repeated demands, the balance remained unpaid. Petitioner filed suit on August 22, 1985 in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila, Branch 48, and respondent was declared in default for non-appearance in May and September 1986. On October 17, 1986, the RTC rendered judgment ordering respondent to pay ₱4,689,413.63 with 14% interest, ₱200,000.00 attorney’s feeCase Digest (G.R. No. 123793)
Facts:
- Merger of Banking Corporations
- On September 16, 1975, Associated Banking Corporation (ABC) and Citizens Bank and Trust Company (CBTC) executed a merger agreement, providing that the merger would be effective upon Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval and issuance of a certificate of merger.
- Upon effectiveness, ABC, as the surviving corporation, would acquire all rights, privileges, assets, liabilities, debts, franchises and contracts of CBTC, and all references to CBTC in existing or future documents would be deemed references to ABC.
- Promissory Note Transaction
- On September 7, 1977, Lorenzo Sarmiento Jr. executed Promissory Note No. TL-2649-77 in favor of CBTC for ₱2,500,000.00, payable on or before March 6, 1978, with 14% annual interest, 3% liquidated damages, compounded interest, and 10% attorney’s fees on default.
- Partial payment of ₱1,000,000.00 was made; the remaining balance of ₱4,689,413.63 (inclusive of interest and charges) remained unpaid despite demand.
- Procedural History
- Associated Bank (ABC’s successor) filed suit on August 22, 1985 before RTC Manila, Branch 48, for collection of the unpaid balance. Sarmiento defaulted to appear at pre-trial, resulting in ex parte presentation of evidence and a judgment on October 17, 1986 in favor of the bank for ₱4,689,413.63 plus interest, attorney’s fees and costs.
- On appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-GR CV No. 26465 (January 30, 1996) held that Associated Bank lacked privity and cause of action because the promissory note was executed in favor of CBTC after the merger agreement, and thus dismissed the complaint.
- ABC petitioned this Court under Rule 45, challenging the CA’s ruling that the surviving corporation could not enforce the post-merger note.
Issues:
- Whether the surviving corporation (Associated Bank) has the right to enforce a promissory note executed in favor of the absorbed corporation (CBTC) after the merger agreement but prior to SEC certification.
- Whether Associated Bank proved privity of contract and a valid cause of action against Sarmiento.
- Whether defenses of prescription, laches, contract pour autrui, and lack of consideration bar the action.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)