Facts:

The case, Heirs of Melecio Arceo vs. Andres E. Varela, was decided by the Supreme Court on May 30, 1958, under G.R. No. L-11073. This case arose from a cadastral proceeding involving Lot No. 14076 situated in Batangas. The claimants in this case were the heirs of Melecio Arceo, who sought to have this property registered in their names. The land had a total assessed value of P1,640.00. The lower court, specifically the Court of First Instance of Batangas, ruled in favor of the heirs of Melecio Arceo and decreed the registration of the lot in their names.

The appellant, Andres E. Varela, contested this ruling, asserting that the trial court made various errors. He assigned three specific errors: first, that the trial court improperly relied on the decision from Civil Case No. 4001, which was confirmed by G.R. No. L-3052 on June 29, 1954, to establish ownership of the disputed lot. Second, he contended that the evidence presented by the heirs did not demonstrate suffici

...

Facts:

Parties and Property

• The case involves the dispute over Lot No. 14076 in the Batangas Cadastre.
• The property, together with its improvements, has an assessed value of P1,640.00.
• The claimants in the case are the Heirs of Melecio Arceo, while Andres E. Varela stands as claimant and appellant.

Procedural History

• The Court of First Instance of Batangas, in Cadastral Case No. 50 (G.L.R.O. Record No. 1820), adjudged and decreed the registration of Lot No. 14076 in favor of the Heirs of Melecio Arceo.
• Andres E. Varela appealed the decision, contesting the registration and the evidentiary basis underlying the trial court’s findings.

Evidence and Previous Decisions

• The trial court relied on a prior decision rendered in Civil Case No. 4001, which was affirmed in G.R. No. L-3052 on June 29, 1954, as a basis to establish the ownership of Lot No. 14076 by the claimants.
• The court also admitted testimonial and documentary evidence which it considered sufficient to prove possession and ownership by the Heirs of Melecio Arceo.

Appellant’s Assignment of Errors

• Appellant Andres E. Varela contended that the trial court erred in relying on the decision in Civil Case No. 4001 (affirmed in G.R. No. L-3052) to prove ownership of the lot.
• He argued that the court improperly concluded that possession and ownership by the claimants were established solely based on the evidence they presented.
• He further charged that the trial court did not give proper credence to his own testimonial and documentary evidence and, accordingly, should have decreed the registration to him instead.

Issue:

• Whether the trial court erred in basing its determination of the claimants’ ownership of Lot No. 14076 on the decision in Civil Case No. 4001 (as affirmed in G.R. No. L-3052).
• Whether the court properly evaluated the testimonial and documentary evidence presented by the claimants as sufficient to prove possession and ownership of the lot.
• Whether the trial court should have given greater weight to the appellant’s own evidence and thus decreed the registration of Lot No. 14076 in his favor.

Ruling:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

• (Subscriber-Only)