Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9667)
Facts:
- Luis Ma. Araneta filed for legal separation from his wife, Emma Benitez Araneta, on grounds of adultery.
- The petition was filed in the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch VI, under Judge Hermogenes Concepcion.
- Emma Benitez Araneta responded with an omnibus petition seeking:
- Custody of their three minor children.
- Monthly support of PHP 5,000 for herself and the children.
- Return of her passport.
- An injunction against harassment.
- Attorney's fees.
- Luis Ma. Araneta opposed the petition, denying misconduct allegations, claiming Emma abandoned the children, and contesting her right to support and attorney's fees due to her infidelity.
- The respondent judge granted Emma:
- Custody of the children.
- Monthly allowance of PHP 2,300 for support.
- PHP 2,000 for attorney's fees.
- Luis Ma. Araneta filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus, challenging the judge's refusal to require evidence before deciding the omnibus petition.
- The Supreme Court granted a writ of preliminary injunction against the order.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court ruled that the court must require evidence to decide on custody and support pendente lite.
- The Supreme Court found the responden...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- Article 103 of the Civil Code mandates a six-month "cooling off" period to facilitate reconciliation between spouses.
- This period does not override other provisions, such as Article 105, which allows for the determination of custody and support pendente lite based on circumstances.
- Ignoring actual facts and circumstances can lead to injustice.
- The introduction of evidence reg...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9667)
Facts:
The case of Araneta v. Concepcion involves a legal separation filed by Luis Ma. Araneta against his wife, Emma Benitez Araneta, on the grounds of adultery. The petition was filed in the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch VI, presided over by Judge Hermogenes Concepcion. Emma Benitez Araneta responded with an omnibus petition seeking custody of their three minor children, monthly support of PHP 5,000 for herself and the children, the return of her passport, an injunction against harassment, and attorney's fees. Luis Ma. Araneta opposed the petition, denying the allegations of misconduct, claiming that Emma had abandoned the children, and contesting her right to attorney's fees and support due to her infidelity. The respondent judge granted Emma custody of the children and a monthly allowance of PHP 2,300 for support, along with PHP 2,000 for attorney's fees. Luis Ma. Araneta filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus, challenging the judge's refusal to require evidence before deciding the omnibus petition. The Supreme Court granted a writ of prelimin...