Case Digest (G.R. No. 92541) Core Legal Reasoning Model
Core Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
In February 1989, petitioner Maria Carmen G. Aquino-Sarmiento, a member of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (“MTRCB”), requested to examine the Board’s records, specifically the individual voting slips used to decide whether films should be banned, cut, or classified. The MTRCB records officer required petitioner to obtain prior clearance from Chairman Manuel L. Morato, who denied access on the ground that these slips were “conscience votes” and thus private to each member. On February 27, 1989, an executive meeting of seventeen members declared all individual voting slips and committee decisions confidential. On July 27, 1989, the Board issued Resolution No. 10-89, formally classifying these records as private. Earlier, under Resolution No. 88-1-25 (June 22, 1988), Chairman Morato had asserted authority to unilaterally downgrade films, a power challenged by petitioner as absent in Presidential Decree (“PD”) 1986. After the Justice Secretary opined that P Case Digest (G.R. No. 92541) Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model
Facts:
- Background of the Petition
- Petitioner Ma. Carmen G. Aquino-Sarmiento, a member of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB), requested in February 1989 access to the Board’s individual voting slips used to decide on banning, cutting, or classifying films and TV productions.
- The MTRCB records officer conditioned access on prior clearance from Chairman Manuel L. Morato, who ultimately denied the request, characterizing the voting slips as private “conscience votes.”
- Administrative Developments
- On February 27, 1989, Morato convened an executive meeting in which 17 Board members voted to classify individual voting records as confidential, thus barring public access without the Chairman’s consent.
- On July 27, 1989, the Board issued Resolution No. 10-89 declaring the reviewing committee’s decisions and individual voting slips confidential, private, and personal.
- Dispute over Unilateral Downgrading Power
- On June 22, 1989, Morato ordered unilateral deletions of the film “Mahirap ang Magmahal,” despite its prior “R-18 without cuts” classification by the Board.
- Petitioner contested that under Presidential Decree (PD) 1986, the Chairman lacks power to reverse a subcommittee or full Board decision; the Justice Secretary later opined that Morato had no such authority, but Morato ignored that opinion.
Issues:
- Whether Resolution No. 10-89 violates Article III, Section 7 of the 1987 Constitution by denying public access to official records.
- Whether PD 1986 and implementing rules authorize the MTRCB Chairman to unilaterally downgrade or reverse decisions of the reviewing sub-committees or the full Board.
- Whether the refusal of Morato and the MTRCB to abide by the Justice Secretary’s Opinion No. 1, Series of 1990, constitutes grave abuse of discretion or capricious, arbitrary action.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)