Title
Aquino III vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 189793
Decision Date
Apr 7, 2010
RA 9716 reconfigures Camarines Sur districts; petitioners claim it violates the 250,000 population rule. SC upholds law, ruling the requirement applies only to cities, not provinces.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 189793)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties
    • Petitioners
      • Senator Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III
      • Mayor Jesse Robredo
– Acting as public officers, taxpayers, and citizens
  • Respondent
– Commission on Elections (COMELEC) represented by Chairman Jose A.R. Melo and Commissioners Rene V. Sarmiento, Nicodemo T. Ferrer, Lucenito N. Tagle, Armando Velasco, Elias Yusoph, and Gregorio Larrazabal
  • Enacted Law and Background
    • Republic Act No. 9716 (RA 9716)
– Titled “An Act Reapportioning the Composition of the First (1st) and Second (2nd) Legislative Districts in the Province of Camarines Sur and Thereby Creating a New Legislative District” – Originated as House Bill No. 4264; signed into law on 12 October 2009; took effect on 31 October 2009
  • Reapportionment Details
    • Pre-RA 9716 (2007 Census total population: 1,693,821)
      • 1st District: nine municipalities; population 417,304
      • 2nd District: ten municipalities/city; population 474,899
      • 3rd District: ten municipalities; population 372,548
      • 4th District: six municipalities/city; population 429,070
    • Post-RA 9716 (creation of 5th District)
      • 1st District: five municipalities; population 176,383
      • 2nd District: seven municipalities; population 276,777
      • 3rd District: (formerly 2nd) seven municipalities/city; population 439,043
      • 4th District: (formerly 3rd) ten municipalities; population 372,548
      • 5th District: (formerly 4th) six municipalities/city; population 429,070
  • Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition
    • Relief Sought
      • Declare RA 9716 unconstitutional for violating Article VI, Section 5(3) of the 1987 Constitution (minimum population of 250,000 per legislative district)
      • Restrain COMELEC from implementing RA 9716
    • Contentions
      • New 1st District’s population (176,383)
      • Constitutional Commission’s original use of a 250,000 “population constant” as baseline for legislative districts

Issues:

  • Procedural Issues
    • Proper Remedy – Whether Certiorari and Prohibition under Rule 65 is the appropriate remedy for constitutional challenge to a statute
    • Locus Standi – Whether petitioners, as public officers, taxpayers, and citizens, have standing to question RA 9716
  • Substantive Issues
    • Constitutional Requirement – Whether the 250,000-minimum population requirement applies to the creation or reapportionment of legislative districts in a province
    • Compliance with Section 5, Article VI – Whether RA 9716 violates requirements of contiguous, compact, and adjacent territory and the population standard for legislative districts

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.