Case Digest (G.R. No. 126576)
Facts:
In Mayor Ricardo M. Angobung v. Commission on Elections En Banc and Atty. Aurora S. de Alban (G.R. No. 126576, March 5, 1997), petitioner Ricardo Angobung, duly elected Mayor of Tumauini, Isabela in the 1995 local elections with 55% of the vote, sought to annul COMELEC Resolution No. 96-2951 dated October 15, 1996. That resolution (1) approved a Petition for Recall filed by only one registered voter, private respondent Aurora Siccuan de Alban, (2) set November 9, 1996 as the date for obtaining additional signatures, and (3) conditioned a recall election on December 2, 1996 should at least 25% of Tumauini’s registered voters sign. Upon filing of the petition, Angobung received a copy on September 12, 1996; it was forwarded to the regional and national COMELEC offices. Acting on a memorandum of the Deputy Executive Director for Operations, the Commission en banc issued the challenged resolution. Petitioner brought a certiorari petition before the Supreme Court and obtained a TempoCase Digest (G.R. No. 126576)
Facts:
- Parties and Background
- Petitioner Ricardo M. Angobung was elected Mayor of Tumauini, Isabela in the 1995 local elections, garnering 55% of votes.
- Private respondent Ma. Aurora Siccuan de Alban was a rival candidate in the same election.
- Recall Petition and COMELEC Resolution
- In early September 1996, de Alban filed a Petition for Recall with the Local Election Registrar, signed only by herself.
- The petition was forwarded to COMELEC Manila; Deputy Executive Director Joson recommended its approval on October 8, 1996.
- On October 15, 1996, COMELEC En Banc issued Resolution No. 96-2951:
- Approved the recall petition despite a single signature.
- Set November 9, 1996 as the date for other voters to sign until 25% of registered voters is reached.
- Scheduled the recall election for December 2, 1996 if the 25% threshold is met.
- Proceedings in the Supreme Court
- Petitioner filed a petition for certiorari and secured a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on October 25, 1996.
- De Alban moved to lift the TRO, arguing (a) the one-year bar issue was settled in Paras v. COMELEC and (b) COMELEC’s two-stage signature procedure mirrors Resolution No. 2272 upheld in Sanchez and Evardone.
- Petitioner challenged Resolution No. 96-2951 as unconstitutional for (a) permitting a one-person initiatory petition and (b) scheduling the recall within one year of the May 1997 Barangay Elections.
Issues:
- Whether COMELEC erred in approving a recall petition filed by only one voter, thereby violating the 25% signature requirement of Section 69(d), Local Government Code of 1991 (RA 7160).
- Whether the scheduling of the recall election on December 2, 1996 falls within the prohibited one-year period before a “regular local election” under Section 74, RA 7160.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)