Case Digest (G.R. No. 263828)
Facts:
On October 6, 2021, petitioner Avelino C. Amangyen filed his Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for the position of Municipal Mayor of Paracelis, Mountain Province, for the May 9, 2022 National and Local Elections. Respondent Franklin W. Talawec, a registered voter of the Municipality, filed a Petition to Cancel Amangyen's COC on November 2, 2021, alleging material misrepresentation. Talawec argued that Amangyen falsely declared eligibility for the office and denied being found liable of an offense carrying the accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification to hold public office. Talawec pointed out that Amangyen was convicted of qualified theft under Presidential Decree No. 705 and sentenced to reclusion temporal by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bontoc, which carries an accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification. This conviction was affirmed with finality by the Court of Appeals and by the Supreme Court in 2018. Amangyen countered that his conviction was not yet fina
Case Digest (G.R. No. 263828)
Facts:
- Filing of Certificate of Candidacy and Petition to Cancel
- On October 6, 2021, Avelino C. Amangyen filed his Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for the position of Municipal Mayor of Paracelis, Mountain Province for the May 9, 2022 National and Local Elections.
- On November 2, 2021, Franklin W. Talawec, a registered voter of Paracelis, filed a Petition to Cancel Amangyen's COC alleging material misrepresentation.
- The grounds included that Amangyen falsely declared eligibility to run for office and claimed he has never been found liable for an offense carrying the accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification.
- Basis of the Petition to Cancel
- Talawec asserted that Amangyen was convicted for qualified theft under Section 77 of Presidential Decree No. 705 and sentenced to reclusion temporal.
- This conviction entails, by operation of law (Articles 41 and 30 of the Revised Penal Code), the accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification to hold public office.
- Talawec also invoked Section 12 of the Omnibus Election Code disqualifying those sentenced to imprisonment exceeding 18 months.
- Respondent's Counter and Pending Incidents
- Amangyen responded on November 29, 2021, claiming his conviction was not yet final due to a pending Motion for Intervention filed by Johnny B. Cailin before the Supreme Court.
- Cailin alleged grave abuse of discretion and violation of due process in Amangyen's conviction and sought to be tried for the crime himself.
- COMELEC Division Resolution
- On April 19, 2022, the COMELEC Second Division granted the Petition, cancelling Amangyen's COC.
- It found the Petition timely and ruled that Amangyen materially misrepresented facts as he was convicted with finality for a crime carrying perpetual disqualification.
- COMELEC En Banc Resolution
- On October 7, 2022, the COMELEC En Banc denied Amangyen’s motion for reconsideration.
- It upheld that the conviction was final and that procedural technicalities could be relaxed in the interest of justice, noting the public interest involved.
- Subsequent Proceedings and Issues
- A petition for certiorari was filed by Amangyen before the Supreme Court contesting the COMELEC decision, alleging the conviction was not final due to a pending Petition for Correction/Determination of Proper Imposable Penalty before the RTC Bontoc.
- The COMELEC issued a Writ of Execution, ordered the annulment of Amangyen’s proclamation as mayor, and creation of a Special Municipal Board of Canvassers.
- Interventions were filed by concerned parties including the Acting Mayor and the candidate who obtained second highest votes.
- Amangyen’s counsel withdrew, and despite the Court’s directive to secure new counsel, Amangyen failed to comply, resulting in the imposition of fines for contempt.
Issues:
- Whether the COMELEC committed grave abuse of discretion in granting the Petition to Cancel the COC despite alleged procedural and substantive infirmities.
- Whether the COMELEC can suspend or relax its procedural rules to address public interest concerns.
- Whether Amangyen’s conviction for violation of Presidential Decree No. 705 was final and executory, affecting his eligibility.
- Whether Amangyen’s COC contained a material misrepresentation in relation to his eligibility.
- Whether Amangyen’s failure to comply with Court directives constitutes contempt.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)