Title
Alvarez vs. Espiritu
Case
G.R. No. L-18833
Decision Date
Aug 14, 1965
The Supreme Court rules that Lot No. 292 is the paraphernal property of Consolacion Evangelista and not the conjugal property of Consolacion Evangelista and Pedro K. Espiritu, reversing the lower court's decision and entitling the conjugal partnership to reimbursement for expenses paid with conjugal funds.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-18833)

Facts:

  • The case Alvarez v. Espiritu (G.R. No. L-18833) was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on August 14, 1965.
  • Plaintiffs-appellants Honesto Alvarez and others disputed the ownership of Lot No. 292 of the Tala Estate, claimed by defendant-appellee Pedro K. Espiritu.
  • The lot was part of the Friar Lands managed under Act No. 1120.
  • Consolacion Evangelista, Pedro's deceased wife, acquired the lot on June 29, 1910, through Sales Certificate No. 479 for P242.04, with the first installment due on July 1, 1910.
  • Consolacion married Pedro on June 13, 1923, and they used conjugal funds to pay the remaining installments, completing payment in 1927.
  • On November 18, 1927, Consolacion executed a deed of assignment transferring her interest in the lot to herself and Pedro, which was registered in their names.
  • After Consolacion's death on February 21, 1949, Pedro sought a summary settlement of her estate, claiming the lot as conjugal property.
  • The lower court ruled in favor of Pedro, declaring him the owner of the entire lot, leading to an appeal from the plaintiffs.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court determined that Lot No. 292 was the paraphernal property of Consolacion Evangelista, not the conjugal property of Consolacion and Pedro K. Espiritu.
  • The Court reversed the lower court's decision, stating that the conjugal partnership was entitled only to reimbursement for expenses paid with conjugal funds.
  • The assignment of the sales certifi...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court highlighted that properties acquired by a woman before marriage remain her paraphernal properties, even if some payments are made with conjugal funds during marriage.
  • The Court referenced Director of Lands v. Rizal, asserting that equitable title passes to the purchaser upon issuance of the sales certificate, with the government retaining no ownership rights beyond protecting its interests.
  • The assignment of the sales certificate was void as it constituted a prohibited transaction between...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.