Title
Altizo vs. BRYC-V Development Corp.
Case
G.R. No. 143530
Decision Date
Sep 26, 2006
In Altizo v. BRYC-V Development Corp., the Supreme Court denied the petitioners' claim to possess Lot 300-C, affirming that the sale of the lot to BRYC-V terminated their right to occupy, as the Letter of Intent did not grant them a right of possession.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 143530)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Gellia Altizo, Spouses Abelardo and Marita "Nenita" Ambrona, Spouses Carlos and Nora Apalad, and Spouses Alvin and Judy Apalad.
  • Location: Lot 300, Seaside, Lower Calarian, Zamboanga City.
  • Lot Owner: Sea Foods Corporation Inc. (SFC).
  • Lot Size: 61,736 square meters, registered under Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-3182 (T-576) since September 21, 1939.
  • Petitioners' Occupation: Began in the early 1960s.
  • Formation of UMCUPAI: In 1989, to negotiate the acquisition of Lot 300.
  • Agreement: On October 4, 1991, SFC and UMCUPAI signed a "Letter of Intent to Sell by Landowner and Letter of Intent to Purchase by the UMCUPAI" at P105.00 per square meter, contingent upon full payment.
  • Subdivision: SFC subdivided Lot 300 into Lot 300-A, Lot 300-B, and Lot 300-C.
  • Sale to UMCUPAI: On January 11, 1995, SFC sold Lot 300-A to UMCUPAI.
  • Sale to BRYC-V: On July 20, 1995, SFC sold Lot 300-C to BRYC-V Development Corporation, despite UMCUPAI's objections.
  • Title Issued: BRYC-V received Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-121,523 for Lot 300-C.
  • Unlawful Detainer Complaint: Filed by BRYC-V when petitioners refused to vacate.
  • MTC Ruling: In favor of BRYC-V on November 11, 1996.
  • RTC Ruling: Reversed MTC decision, favoring petitioners based on the Letter of Intent.
  • Court of Appeals Ruling: Reversed RTC decision on March 8, 1999, favoring BRYC-V.
  • Motion for Reconsideration: Denied on August 27, 1999.
  • Petition for Review: Filed by petitioners with the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court denied the petitioners' claim to possess Lot 300-C.
  2. The Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals, ruling that BRYC-V, as...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The petitioners' occupation of Lot 300-C was based on the mere tolerance of the previous owner, SFC.
  • This right to occupy ceased when SFC sold the lot to BRYC-V, which was issued a title and thus entitled to possession.
  • The Letter of Intent did not grant the petitioners any right of possession; it merely signified SFC's intention to sell the property to UMCUPAI, not...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.