Title
Almeda vs. Florentino
Case
G.R. No. L-23800
Decision Date
Dec 21, 1965
Dispute over Pasay City Municipal Board Secretary appointment: Almeda (Vice-Mayor appointee) vs. Florentino (Board appointee). SC ruled Florentino valid under original charter, no implied repeal of specific provision.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-23800)

Facts:

    Background of the Case

    • The controversy involves the appointment to the position of Secretary of the Municipal Board of Pasay City.
    • Two parties, Policarpo Almeda (plaintiff-appellant) and Julian Florentino (defendant-appellee), claim title to the said position.

    Statutory Framework

    • Republic Act No. 183 (the Pasay City Charter), enacted on June 21, 1947, outlines the constitution and organization of the Municipal Board.
    • Section 12 of RA 183 originally provided that the Municipal Board was composed of the Mayor as presiding officer, the Vice-Mayor as ex-officio councilor, and seven councilors elected at large.
    • Section 14 of RA 183 specifically provided for the appointment, salary, and duties of the Board Secretary, with the appointment to be made by the Municipal Board itself.

    Amendatory Legislation

    • On June 18, 1960, Republic Act No. 2709 amended Section 12 of RA 183.
    • The amendment restructured the Municipal Board by eliminating the Mayor from the composition, vesting the presiding power in the Vice-Mayor, and increasing the number of councilors to ten.
    • RA 2709 also conferred on the Vice-Mayor the power to appoint “all the employees of the Board” as necessary, subject to limitations provided by law.

    Factual Timeline Leading to the Dispute

    • On January 1, 1964, in conformity with the amended city charter under RA 2709, the Vice-Mayor of Pasay City appointed Policarpo Almeda as Secretary of the Municipal Board.
    • The following day, the Municipal Board itself refused to recognize Almeda’s appointment and, instead, appointed Julian Florentino as the Board Secretary pursuant to Section 14 of RA 183.
    • This led to the filing of a quo warranto proceeding by Almeda challenging the validity of Florentino’s appointment and asserting that the Vice-Mayor’s appointment powers, as provided in the amended Section 12, should extend to the Secretary.

    Procedural History

    • The trial court (Court of First Instance of Pasay City) dismissed the quo warranto petition instituted by Almeda.
    • Subsequently, Almeda appealed, leading to the issuance of the case decision under discussion.

Issue:

    Primary Legal Issue

    • Which statutory provision governs the appointment of the Secretary of the Municipal Board of Pasay City: the original charter (Republic Act No. 183, Section 14) or the amendatory act (Republic Act No. 2709, Section 12)?

    Substantive Points for Consideration

    • Whether the power conferred upon the Vice-Mayor by RA 2709 to appoint “all the employees of the Board” implicitly includes the appointment of the Board Secretary.
    • The need to determine if the legislature intended to modify or repeal the specific provisions under Section 14 of RA 183 regarding the appointment of the Secretary.
    • Establishing the scope and limits of legislative amendments when juxtaposed with specific provisions already existing in a seminal charter.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.