Title
Aldovino vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 121189
Decision Date
Nov 16, 1998
Aldovino and Pimentel challenge the legality of their layoffs, but are barred from raising the issue due to a prior judgment by a voluntary arbitrator.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 121189)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Gaudencio A. Aldovino and Anacleto G. Pimentel, employees of Atlantic Gulf and Pacific Company of Manila, Inc. (AG & P).
  • Employment Dates: Pimentel began on April 25, 1985; Aldovino joined in June 1989.
  • Union Membership: Both became regular members of the United Rank and File Association (URFA), the recognized labor union for AG & P's rank-and-file workers.
  • Layoff Directive: On July 25, 1991, AG & P announced temporary layoffs due to financial losses affecting many employees.
  • Union Response: URFA filed a notice of strike, leading to a conciliatory conference and an agreement to submit the layoff issue to voluntary arbitration.
  • Financial Assistance: A financial assistance agreement was established on September 7, 1991, for laid-off employees.
  • Layoff Notices: Aldovino and Pimentel received layoff notices on September 17, 1991, along with financial assistance.
  • Arbitration Outcome: In January 1992, a voluntary arbitrator upheld AG & P's right to lay off employees.
  • Legal Complaints: In 1994, Aldovino and Pimentel filed complaints against AG & P for unfair labor practices and illegal dismissal, which were consolidated.
  • Labor Arbiter's Ruling: The Labor Arbiter ruled the layoffs illegal, but AG & P appealed, citing res judicata based on the earlier arbitration ruling.
  • NLRC Decision: The NLRC sided with AG & P, stating the issue had been resolved in the company's favor.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition by Aldovino and Pimentel.
  • The Court affirmed the NLRC resolutions dated February 18, 1995, and March 30, 1995.
  • It held that res judicata barred the petitioners from contesting the legality o...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • For res judicata to apply, the former judgment must be final, the court must have jurisdiction, the judgment must be on the merits, and there must be identity of parties, subject matter, and causes of action.
  • Aldovino and Pimentel, as URFA members, were bound by the voluntary arbitrator's decision, which upheld the legality of the layoffs.
  • The union'...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.