Title
Supreme Court
Aguirre vs. Secretary, Department of Justice
Case
G.R. No. 170723
Decision Date
Mar 3, 2008
A mentally disabled man underwent a vasectomy with guardian consent; sister alleged mutilation and falsification. Courts ruled no mutilation or falsification, upholding dismissal of charges.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 212960)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Background of Parties and Proceedings
    • Petitioner Gloria Pilar S. Aguirre sought reversal of:
      • The 8 January 2003 Resolution of the Quezon City Office of the City Prosecutor (OCP) dismissing her criminal complaint for insufficiency of evidence.
      • The DOJ Resolutions of 11 February 2004 and 12 November 2004 affirming the OCP dismissal.
      • The Court of Appeals Decision of 21 July 2005 and Resolution of 5 December 2005 denying her Rule 65 certiorari petition.
    • Respondents
      • Pedro B. Aguirre and Michelina S. Aguirre-Olondriz (legal guardians of Laureano “Larry” Aguirre)
      • Dr. Juvido Agatep (urologist/surgeon)
      • Dr. Marissa B. Pascual (psychiatrist)
      • Various John/Jane Does alleged to have facilitated the medical procedure
  • Facts Leading to the Complaint
    • Laureano “Larry” Aguirre’s Guardianship and Condition
      • Adopted from Heart of Mary Villa orphanage; informal custody in 1978; Affidavit of Consent to Legal Guardianship in June 1980; RTC Balanga co-guardianship order on 19 June 1986.
      • Developmental delays: first words at age 3; walked at age 5; diagnosed mild to moderate mental deficiency in 1989; transferred to a special education institution.
    • Medical Evaluation and Procedure
      • In November 2001 Dr. Agatep proposed a bilateral vasectomy; required psychiatric clearance.
      • Dr. Pascual’s Psychiatry Report (21 January 2002) found Larry mentally deficient, recommended decision-making by parent/guardian.
      • Larry’s guardian Pedro Aguirre gave written consent; Dr. Agatep performed vasectomy on 31 January 2002.
    • Complaint by Petitioner (11 June 2002)
      • Charged respondents with violation of R.P.C. Arts. 172 (Falsification by private individuals) and 262 (Mutilation), in relation to RA 7610 (Child Abuse Act), for “mutilation via bilateral vasectomy” without Larry’s consent or court authorization.
      • Alleged conspiracy in falsifying the psychiatric report to declare Larry incompetent and in defaming Lourdes Aguirre by diagnosing her with Bipolar Mood Disorder without proper examination.

Issues:

  • Whether the DOJ and the Court of Appeals committed grave abuse of discretion in affirming the finding of no probable cause to charge respondents with:
    • Falsification under R.P.C. Art. 172 (in relation to Art. 171).
    • Mutilation under R.P.C. Art. 262 (in relation to RA 7610).

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.