Title
Aguda vs. Vallejos
Case
G.R. No. 58133
Decision Date
Mar 26, 1982
Employees file a complaint for illegal dismissal and damages against their employer, but the Supreme Court upholds the dismissal, stating that the claim for damages falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter and the National Labor Relations Commission.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 58133)

Facts:

  • The case Aguda v. Vallejos, G.R. No. 58133, was decided on March 26, 1982.
  • Petitioners: Mercedes Aguda, Aurea Pedrozo, Josephine Caraang, Lilia Durwin, Lourdes Larin, Lerna Villablanca, and Bernabe Llarenas, Jr.
  • All petitioners were employees at Adamson Ozanam Educational Institution, Inc., working in the canteen from 1974 until their dismissal on June 2, 1980.
  • On June 27, 1980, they filed a complaint with the Ministry of Labor, alleging illegal dismissal and seeking compensation for:
    • Underpayment
    • Overtime pay
    • Legal holiday pay
    • Premium pay for holidays
    • Violations of various presidential decrees
  • On July 2, 1980, they filed a separate complaint in the Court of First Instance of Manila for damages totaling P300,000.
  • The trial court dismissed the damages complaint on July 22, 1980, due to lack of jurisdiction.
  • A motion for reconsideration was filed but was ineffective due to the absence of a notice of hearing.
  • The case was dismissed without prejudice on July 24, 1981, for failure to prosecute.
  • The petitioners then sought a certiorari petition from the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court's dismissal orders.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, upholding the lower court's decision.
  • The Court determined that the petitioners' claims for damages were under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The ruling was based on the interpretation of Presidential Decree No. 1691, which restored the jurisdiction of Labor Arbiters and the NLRC over all claims related to employer-employee relations, including moral and exemplary damages.
  • The Court noted that this decree nullified a previous decree (Presidential Decree No. 1367) that had removed such jur...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.