Title
Agot vs. Rivera
Case
A.C. No. 8000
Decision Date
Aug 5, 2014
In the case of Agot v. Rivera, Atty. Luis P. Rivera is found guilty of deceitful conduct for misrepresenting himself as an immigration lawyer and failing to facilitate the issuance of a US visa, resulting in a two-year suspension from the practice of law and an order to return the complainant's downpayment.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.C. No. 8000)

Facts:

  • In Agot v. Rivera, A.C. No. 8000, decided on August 5, 2014, Chamelyn A. Agot filed a Complaint-Affidavit against Atty. Luis P. Rivera.
  • Agot accused Rivera of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) and the lawyer's oath by misrepresenting himself as an immigration lawyer, engaging in deceit, and failing to return her money despite several demands.
  • Agot sought Rivera's services to secure a US visa to attend her best friend's wedding in the US.
  • On November 17, 2007, they signed a Contract of Legal Services, with Rivera agreeing to secure a US immigrant visa for Agot before the wedding.
  • Agot paid Rivera PhP350,000.00 as a downpayment, with the balance due upon the visa's issuance.
  • The contract stipulated a refund of the downpayment if the visa application was denied for specific reasons not attributable to Agot.
  • Rivera failed to secure the visa and ignored Agot's demands for a refund.
  • Agot filed a criminal complaint for estafa and an administrative complaint.
  • Rivera claimed he was deceived by Rico Pineda, whom he believed to be a US consul, and failed to return Agot's money.
  • The IBP Investigating Commissioner found Rivera administratively liable and recommended a six-month suspension, with an order to return the PhP350,000.00 with legal interest.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court found Atty. Luis P. Rivera guilty of violating Rule 1.01 of Canon 1, Rules 16.01 and 16.03 of Canon 16, and Rule 18.03 of Canon 18 of the CPR.
  • Rivera was suspended from the practice of law for two years.
  • Rivera was ordered to return the PhP350,000.00 to Ago...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court concurred with the IBP's findings, subject to modifying the recommended penalty.
  • Lawyers must maintain high standards of legal proficiency, morality, honesty, integrity, and fair dealing.
  • Rivera misrepresented himself as an immigration lawyer, leading Agot to seek his assistance and pay PhP350,000.00.
  • Rivera had no specialization in immigration law and failed to prove Pineda's identity, making his defense self-serving and without probative value.
  • Rivera's deception was unacceptable and dishonorable, revealing a moral flaw making him unfit to practice law.
  • Rivera faile...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.