Case Digest (G.R. No. L-17898)
Facts:
Pastor D. Ago, the petitioner, purchased sawmill machineries and equipment from Grace Park Engineering, Inc. in 1957 for a total price of P32,000.00, which he agreed to pay in installments secured by a chattel mortgage. After defaulting on his payments, Grace Park Engineering, Inc. initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings in 1958. To stop this foreclosure, Ago filed Special Civil Case No. 53 in the Court of First Instance of Agusan. The parties reached a compromise agreement, which was submitted to the court and dictated in open court on January 28, 1959, by Judge Montano A. Ortiz. After continued default on the judgment terms, the court granted a motion for execution on August 15, 1959, leading to the issuance of a writ of execution on September 23, 1959. The respondent Provincial Sheriff of Surigao acted on this writ and proceeded to levy the machineries, which were located in a sawmill building owned by the Golden Pacific Sawmill, Inc. Ago alleged that the Sheriff’s ac
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-17898)
Facts:
- In 1957, petitioner Pastor D. Ago purchased sawmill machineries and equipments from respondent Grace Park Engineering, Inc.
- To secure payment of an outstanding balance of P32,000.00 payable by installments, Pastor D. Ago executed a chattel mortgage over the said machineries and equipments.
Background of the Transaction
- Petitioner defaulted on his payments, prompting respondent Grace Park Engineering, Inc. to institute extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings in 1958.
- In response, petitioner filed Special Civil Case No. 53 in the Court of First Instance of Agusan to enjoin the foreclosure action.
Default and Initiation of Legal Proceedings
- The parties reached a compromise agreement, which they submitted in writing to the court, duly signed by both Pastor D. Ago and Grace Park Engineering, Inc.
- On January 28, 1959, the Hon. Montano A. Ortiz, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Agusan, rendered a judgment in open court based on this compromise agreement.
Compromise Agreement and Judgment
- On August 15, 1959, following a motion for execution by respondent, the Court of First Instance issued a writ of execution.
- A writ dated September 23, 1959, was subsequently executed by the Provincial Sheriff of Surigao, who levied the machineries and equipments.
- The machineries and equipments, installed in a sawmill building owned by Golden Pacific Sawmill, Inc. in Lianga, Surigao del Sur, were thus subject to sale at public auction.
Writ of Execution and Subsequent Sale
- Petitioner contended that even though the judgment was dictated in open court on January 28, 1959, he did not receive a formal and valid copy of the judgment until September 25, 1959.
- He argued that the issuance of the writ of execution prior to the receipt of a correctly served copy of the judgment was unauthorized and constituted an excess of judicial authority.
- Further, petitioner challenged the public auction sale, asserting that the necessary publication and advertisement of the sale notice were not complied with as required by law.
Petitioner’s Allegations and Petition for Certiorari
Issue:
- Does the open court rendition of the judgment fulfill the requirement of formal and valid service?
- Is the mere fact of a party’s presence in court and hearing the judgment being dictated sufficient to constitute proper notice?
Validity of Notice of Judgment
- Was the issuance of the writ of execution valid considering that the petitioner was not properly served with the signed and filed judgment?
- Is the public auction sale of the sawmill machineries and equipments valid when conducted without the mandatory notice publication and advertisement as prescribed by the Rules of Court?
Compliance with Execution and Sale Requirements
- Given the installation of the machineries in a building, should they be classified as movable or, by virtue of becoming a permanent part of the real estate, as immovable property?
Nature of the Sawmill Machineries and Equipments
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Doctrine:
- (Subscriber-Only)