Title
Agcaoili, Jr. vs. Farinas
Case
G.R. No. 232395
Decision Date
Jul 3, 2018
The Court dismissed the "Ilocos 6" employees' Omnibus Petition for habeas corpus and to stop a legislative inquiry, citing mootness and Congress's jurisdiction.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 232395)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Pedro S. Agcaoili, Jr., Encarnacion A. Gaor, Josephine P. Calajate, Genedine D. Jambaro, Eden C. Battulayan, Evangeline C. Tabulog, and Maria Imelda Josefa "Imee" R. Marcos.
  • Respondents: Representatives Rodolfo C. Fariñas, Johnny T. Pimentel, and Lt. Gen. Roland Detabali (Ret.), Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives.
  • Background: On March 14, 2017, House Resolution No. 882 was introduced to investigate the Provincial Government of Ilocos Norte's use of excise tax shares, particularly regarding alleged violations of Republic Act No. 7171.
  • Petitioners, employees of the Provincial Government, were summoned to testify but did not appear, leading to a subpoena.
  • They claimed intimidation and threats during hearings, resulting in citations for contempt and detention.
  • On May 30, 2017, they filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus with the Court of Appeals (CA), which initially ordered their release but later dismissed the petition as moot after their release on July 13, 2017.
  • The petitioners then filed an Omnibus Petition seeking the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over the Habeas Corpus Petition, a writ of prohibition against the legislative inquiry, and a writ of Amparo for protection.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the Omnibus Petition.
  • The petition for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus was rendered moot by the petitioners' release from detention.
  • The Court cannot assume jurisdiction over the Habeas Corpus Petition as it was already pending before the CA.
  • The legislative inquiry cannot be enjoined by a writ of prohibition a...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court determined that the release of the petitioners from detention made the Habeas Corpus Petition moot, as the writ's primary purpose is to address involuntary restraint.
  • Jurisdiction over such petitio...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.