Title
Abines vs. Duque III
Case
G.R. No. 235891
Decision Date
Sep 20, 2022
Children vaccinated with Dengvaxia sought mandamus, alleging health risks; SC dismissed, citing policy discretion and lack of environmental claim.

Case Digest (A.C. No. 2474)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties
    • Petitioners
      • Seventy-four (74) children who received the Dengvaxia vaccine, represented by their parents
      • Additional petitioners suing as concerned citizens, taxpayers, and legislators, including Gabriela, ARCS SEA officers, and three legislators
    • Respondents
      • Dr. Francisco T. Duque III, Secretary of Health
      • Dr. Lyndon L. Lee Suy, DOH National Center for Disease Prevention & Control Director
      • Nela Charade G. Puno, RPh, FDA Director General
      • Hon. Leonor Magtolis Briones, Secretary of Education
      • Hon. Catalino S. Cuy, Officer-in-Charge, Department of Interior & Local Government
  • Dengvaxia Immunization Program Timeline
    • Program Inception and Rollout (Dec 2015–Feb 2016)
      • Dec 2015: DOH Sec. Janette Garin meets Sanofi Pasteur at Paris Climate Summit; proposes procurement of 3 million doses
      • FDA approves Dengvaxia; DBM releases ₱3.5 billion SAO; PCCM procures 600,000 vials; program launched in NCR, Region III, Region IV-A for public elementary students aged nine and above
    • Suspension, Advisory, and Petition (Jul 2016–Feb 2020)
      • Jul 2016: Sec. Ubial suspends program on safety grounds; later lifts suspension and expands to Cebu
      • Nov 2017: Sanofi advisory warns seronegative recipients risk severe disease; Dec 1, 2017: Sec. Duque suspends program; FDA halts sale/distribution
      • Dec 2017: Petition for Writ of Continuing Mandamus filed with SC; parties exchange comments and memoranda; SC resolutions issued through Feb 2020

Issues:

  • Do petitioners have legal standing to file the Petition?
  • Is this direct Petition an exception to the doctrine of hierarchy of courts?
  • Are petitioners entitled to a writ of continuing mandamus, and would its issuance violate separation of powers?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.