Title
AA Total Learning Center for Young Achievers, Inc. vs. Caro
Case
A.C. No. 12418
Decision Date
Mar 10, 2020
Atty. Caronan, already disbarred for identity fraud, faced another complaint for impersonation and fraud in a land sale, but the case was dismissed as moot.
A

Case Digest (A.C. No. 12418)

Facts:

  • Background and Complaint
  • On November 22, 2012, AA Total Learning Center for Young Achievers, Inc., represented by Loyda L. Reyes, filed a Verified Complaint for Disbarment (CBD Case No. 14-4396) against Atty. Patrick A. Caronan for alleged violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
  • AA engaged Caronan and Solly Cruz to broker the purchase of a parcel of land in Taguig City, purportedly on behalf of the registered owner, Maricel A. Atanacio.
  • Sale Transaction and Fraudulent Acts
  • In March 2012, the parties agreed on a purchase price of ₱15,650,000 inclusive of fees and taxes, with earnest money of ₱250,000; Reyes paid ₱100,000 on March 9 and ₱150,000 on March 23.
  • A Deed of Absolute Sale and Memorandum of Agreement were presented bearing a forged signature of Atanacio; Reyes paid an additional ₱7,000,000 via manager’s check and ₱450,000 for taxes and transfer fees.
  • Caronan promised to secure title transfer by June 2012 but failed to deliver; actual owner Atanacio disowned the transaction on July 19, 2012, denying any sale or authorization.
  • Investigation revealed that Caronan conspired with Noraida Tanon to impersonate Atanacio, withdrawing ₱2,000,000 and depositing ₱5,000,000 into Caronan’s wife’s bank account; Tanon later admitted the impersonation in a sworn statement.
  • Subsequent Legal Actions and Respondent’s Defense
  • Reyes filed a criminal complaint for estafa and an Anti-Alias Law case; it was discovered that respondent’s real name is Richard A. Caronan, who assumed his brother’s identity to obtain a law degree.
  • Caronan denied all accusations, alleging the disbarment complaint was retaliatory, and argued that identity issues were previously resolved in A.C. Nos. 10074 and 11316.
  • He moved to dismiss or hold in abeyance the administrative case pending resolution of criminal proceedings.
  • IBP Commission on Bar Discipline Proceedings
  • Investigating Commissioner Ferdinand I. DiAo recommended dismissal as moot, citing this Court’s prior disbarment of “Atty. Patrick A. Caronan” in A.C. No. 11316 (July 12, 2016).
  • The IBP Board of Governors adopted the findings and recommended imposing the ultimate penalty of disbarment and striking respondent’s name off the Roll of Attorneys.
  • The sole issue presented to the Supreme Court was whether respondent should be disbarred and stricken off the Roll of Attorneys in CBD Case No. 14-4396.

Issues:

  • Main Issue
  • Whether respondent Atty. Patrick A. Caronan should be disbarred and his name permanently stricken off the Roll of Attorneys in CBD Case No. 14-4396.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.