Title
20th Century Fox Film Corp. vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 76649-51
Decision Date
Aug 19, 1988
20th Century Fox alleged video piracy; search warrants issued, later lifted due to lack of probable cause and overbreadth, upheld by Supreme Court.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 76649-51)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Letter‐Complaint and NBI Investigation
  • On August 26, 1985, 20th Century Fox Film Corporation (“petitioner”) filed a letter‐complaint with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), alleging that various Metro Manila videotape outlets were unauthorizedly selling and renting copyrighted films in violation of PD No. 49.
  • The NBI conducted surveillance of the outlets identified by petitioner, confirming alleged piracy activities.
  • Application and Issuance of Search Warrants
  • The NBI filed three consolidated applications for search warrants against the video outlets owned by private respondents Barreto, Sagullo, and Ledesma before RTC Makati Branch 132.
  • On September 4, 1985, the RTC issued Search Warrants Nos. SW-85-024, SW-85-025, and SW-85-026, authorizing seizure of videotapes, recording equipment, television sets, and other paraphernalia described generally in the warrants.
  • Execution and Subsequent Proceedings
  • The NBI, accompanied by petitioner’s agents, executed the warrants, seized the items, and left an inventory with respondents.
  • Respondents moved to lift the warrants and return the seized items; on October 8, 1985, the RTC granted the motion, ordering the warrants lifted and the items returned through counsel.
  • Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration was denied on January 2, 1986. Petitioner’s certiorari petition to the Court of Appeals was dismissed, prompting the present petition to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

  • Validity of Initial Warrants
  • Whether the RTC properly found probable cause to issue the search warrants, considering the constitutional requirement of personal knowledge and particularity.
  • Whether the absence of presentation of master tapes and reliance on NBI witnesses’ testimony invalidated probable cause.
  • Legitimacy of Lifting Warrants
  • Whether the RTC committed grave abuse of discretion or violated due process in lifting the warrants and ordering return of seized properties.
  • Whether the warrants’ general description of items rendered them constitutionally defective as “general warrants.”

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.