G.R. No. 96643 - Deiparine, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals

Deiparine, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Deiparine, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals

Case: G.R. No. 96643

Decision Date: Apr 23, 1993

A 1982 construction contract dispute arose when a contractor deviated from agreed plans, leading to structural defects. Core tests confirmed safety failures, prompting the owners to seek rescission. Courts upheld jurisdiction, ruled breach justified rescission under Civil Code, and affirmed damages.

construction contractor

stipulated plans and specifications

rescission

Standard 16 min

END