G.R. No. 239390 - Bright Maritime Corp. vs. Racela

Bright Maritime Corp. vs. Racela

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Bright Maritime Corp. vs. Racela

Case: G.R. No. 239390

Decision Date: Jun 3, 2019

A seafarer claimed disability benefits for aortic valve stenosis, alleging work-relatedness. The Supreme Court ruled against him, finding no substantial evidence linking his illness to his employment as a fitter, emphasizing the need for proof of work-relatedness under POEA-SEC.

employer

ship owner

lack of evidence

Very Long 42 min

END