G.R. No. 188051 - Asia United Bank vs. Goodland Co., Inc.

Asia United Bank vs. Goodland Co., Inc.

Getting related questions...
Conversations stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. Know more about your privacy jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Asia United Bank vs. Goodland Co., Inc.

Case: G.R. No. 188051

Decision Date: Nov 22, 2010

AUB sought a writ of possession after foreclosing on GOODLAND's property. GOODLAND contested, citing forgery and invalid counsel substitution. SC ruled for AUB, emphasizing procedural compliance and ministerial writ issuance.

notice of appeal

invalid substitution of counsel

writ of possession

Standard 16 min

END