G.R. No. L-9405 - Anacleto Conde, et al. vs. Felix Cuence and Elpidia Malaga

Ask AI

G.R. No. L-9405: Anacleto Conde, et al. vs. Felix Cuence and Elpidia Malaga

Getting related questions...
What do you want to know about the case?
Your conversations and searches stay on your device. We do not store or track your activity on our servers. To know more about our privacy commitment see jur.ph/privacy Ask AI provides quick answers grounded in full case texts to avoid mistakes. Always verify with the original text.

Ask AI

Title Supreme Court: Anacleto Conde, et al. vs. Felix Cuence and Elpidia Malaga

Case: G.R. No. L-9405

Decision Date: Jul 31, 1956

Landowner Anacleto Conde claimed a 1943 deed was a mortgage, not a sale. The Supreme Court ruled reformation, not annulment, was proper, with a 10-year prescriptive period, remanding for further proceedings.

contract

mortgage

reformation

Very Short 4 min

0.3x of typical case length

END