Title
People vs. Samson y Cruz
Case
G.R. No. 247973
Decision Date
Jun 30, 2021
Tamundi convicted for illegal shabu sale; SC upheld conviction, citing proper chain of custody despite minor procedural deviation.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 247973)

Factual Background

On January 9, 2015, a buy-bust operation was organized by the Philippine National Police (PNP) Anti-Illegal Drugs Special Operations Task Force (AIDSOTF) based on reports from a confidential informant about illegal drug transactions. The designated poseur buyer, PO3 Junel Dela Cruz, along with back-up officer SPO2 Michael Calimlim, arranged to buy 300 grams of methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as shabu, for P300,000, planned for execution the following day at a fast-food restaurant in Quezon City.

At the agreed upon time, Tamundi approached the undercover officers after they had arrived at the target location. Upon confirming the money from PO3 Dela Cruz, Tamundi handed over a black paper bag containing the drugs in exchange for the buy-bust money. Following the transaction, she was arrested by the police, and the confiscated items underwent proper documentation, including marking and inventory in the presence of witnesses from the media and local government.

RTC Ruling

The RTC convicted Tamundi on September 17, 2018, sentencing her to life imprisonment and imposing a fine of P500,000. The court found that the prosecution had successfully proven all elements required for a conviction under the law, including the identities of the buyer and seller, the object of the sale being shabu, and the actual delivery of the drug in exchange for the money. Tamundi's defense was deemed insufficient, lacking corroborating witnesses, and the court noted the presumption of regularity in the actions of law enforcement officers during the operation.

CA Ruling

Tamundi subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which affirmed the RTC ruling on June 29, 2020. The CA reiterated that the conviction would stand as long as there was credible proof of the sale and the physical evidence linking the accused to the crime, confirming the testimonies of the buy-bust team as reliable. Despite Tamundi's arguments regarding the chain of custody and procedural deviation, the CA concluded that the prosecution adequately established that the contraband was handled according to the established laws regarding drug transactions.

Issues Presented

The primary issue focused on whether Tamundi was guilty of illegal sale of dangerous drugs as charged. The legal determination required the court to establish that the elements of the crime were met, including the identity of the seller and buyer, the transaction, and the object and consideration.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court ultimately found the appeal without merit. It underscored the necessity of proving the actual sale and the corpus delicti of the crime—the seized drugs. The testimonies provided by the police clearly identified Ta

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.