Title
People vs. Dela Cruz y Libonao
Case
G.R. No. 234151
Decision Date
Dec 5, 2018
Accused acquitted as prosecution failed to prove compliance with RA 9165's chain of custody rules, compromising evidence integrity.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 234151)

Applicable Law

The applicable law is Section 5, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165, known as the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, which penalizes the illegal sale and distribution of dangerous drugs.

Facts of the Case

The Information against Dela Cruz charged that on June 6, 2010, he unlawfully sold shabu weighing approximately 0.02 grams to a poseur buyer, who was an agent of the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA). The designated buy-bust money used in the operation consisted of two P500 bills, marked with specific serial numbers. Dela Cruz was apprehended during the transaction, wherein he was caught attempting to sell the illegal substance.

Version of the Prosecution

The prosecution detailed a well-coordinated buy-bust operation initiated upon receiving a tip-off regarding Dela Cruz’s illegal activities. After a briefing with the designated poseur buyer, Dela Cruz was located and approached at his residence, where the transaction occurred. The prosecution presented evidence that included the confiscated sachet containing shabu, which was submitted to the PNP Regional Crime Laboratory for analysis, returning a positive result for methamphetamine.

Version of the Defense

In defense, Dela Cruz and his son testified that the accused was innocent and claimed that five PDEA agents unlawfully entered their home, pointing a firearm at Dela Cruz and arresting him without any legal basis. Dela Cruz alleged that he was tortured by the PDEA operatives to divulge information on other drug personalities.

Ruling of the RTC

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Dela Cruz guilty as charged, noting that the prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt the two required elements of illegal sale of drugs. The defense's claims of irregularities and torture were dismissed as self-serving and unsupported by corroborating evidence. Consequently, the RTC imposed life imprisonment and a fine of PHP 500,000, along with the confiscation of the illegal drugs for proper disposition.

Ruling of the CA

The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's decision, opining that the prosecution successfully proved all the elements of illegal drug sale, and dismissed the defense’s claims regarding procedural lapses in the execution of the buy-bust operation, ruling that non-compliance with certain procedures did not invalidate the seizures.

Issue on Appeal

The pivotal issue on appeal was whether Dela Cruz's guilt for violation of Section 5 of RA 9165 was proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court found merit in the appeal and acquitted Dela Cruz. The Court emphasized that in drug-related cases, the identity and integrity of the seized drugs are crucial for a conviction. It pointed out the necessity of establishing an unbroken chain of custody for the evidence, which includes conducting physical inventories and securing the presence of designated witnesses immediately after seizure at the point of arrest.

Non-Compliance with Chain of Custody Requirements

It was determined that the buy-bust team failed to follow the mandatory requirements under Section 21 of RA 9165, particularly regarding the immediate marking and photographing of the evidence at the place of arrest. Additionally,

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.