Title
IN RE: Regina Stella P. Jacinto
Case
B.M. No. 4720
Decision Date
Jan 30, 2024
Regina Stella P. Jacinto sought to retain her privilege to practice law after acquiring Maltese citizenship. The Court ruled in her favor, allowing her to resume her legal practice.
A

Case Summary (B.M. No. 4720)

Relevant Facts

Jacinto was admitted to the Philippine Bar on April 11, 1996, holding Roll of Attorneys No. 40547. Subsequent to acquiring Maltese citizenship on May 29, 2023, she claimed that the Maltese Citizenship Act allows dual citizenship and does not necessitate the renunciation of her Philippine citizenship. Referencing Republic Act (RA) 9225, known as the "Citizenship Retention and Re-acquisition Act of 2003," Jacinto argued that her Philippine citizenship remained intact since her Maltese citizenship was acquired post-enactment of the law. To formalize her status, Jacinto filed a Petition for Retention/Re-Acquisition of Philippine Citizenship on June 29, 2023, which was granted by the Bureau of Immigration (BI) on July 14, 2023. Subsequently, she took her Oath of Allegiance on August 7, 2023.

Documentation Submitted

Jacinto's application to the OBC included several key documents: a copy of her Maltese citizenship certificate, a certified copy of her petition for citizenship retention, the pertinent orders from the BI, certificates of good standing from the OBC and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), a letter of recommendation, various certifications, and proof of compliance with professional tax obligations.

OBC Report and Recommendation

In its report dated October 2, 2023, the OBC recommended that Jacinto be permitted to retake the Lawyer's Oath and to sign the Roll of Attorneys. The OBC indicated that Jacinto had met all requirements as determined in previous rulings, particularly the precedent set in In Re: Muneses.

Legal Issue

The primary issue presented to the Court was whether Regina Stella P. Jacinto's privilege to practice law in the Philippines should be formally recognized, given her special circumstances regarding citizenship.

Court's Ruling

The Court's ruling concurred with the OBC's recommendation with modifications. It reiterated that practicing law is a privilege that is contingent upon specific requirements, primarily that the individual must maintain Philippine citizenship and adhere to professional standards. Citing Rule 138, Section 2 of the Rules of Court, the ruling emphasized the continuous requirement for Philippine citizenship to practice law. The Court pointedly noted that loss of citizenship results in termination of bar membership.

The Court further referenced prior cases, affirm

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.