Title
Dawa vs. De Asa
Case
A.M. No. MTJ-98-1144, MTJ-98-1148
Decision Date
Jul 22, 1998
Judge Armando C. de Asa was dismissed for sexual harassment and acts of lasciviousness against three court employees, violating judicial ethics and the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act.
A

Case Summary (A.M. No. MTJ-98-1144, MTJ-98-1148)

Allegations and Complaints

The first complaint was filed on August 15, 1997, alleging various acts of sexual harassment by Judge de Asa, which prompted the Court to impose a preventive suspension effective December 10, 1997, while the investigation was conducted. Atty. Mona Lisa A. Buencamino subsequently filed her own complaint stating she too had been a victim of the judge's misconduct, which led to the consolidation of her case with those of the other complainants. The investigation involved testimonies from the complainants detailing the nature and extent of the alleged misconduct.

Complainants' Testimonies

Floride Dawa recounted an incident dated August 8, 1997, where she was allegedly kissed forcibly by Judge de Asa in his chamber after a brief conversation about the cleanliness of the ladies' restroom. Dawa expressed her shock and panic from the situation and subsequently confided in fellow court employees, including Judge Delfina Hernandez-Santiago. Noraliz Jorgensen testified about multiple unwanted advances, including being kissed and held against her will on three separate occasions, asserting that she feared for her safety. Femenina Lazaro-Barreto reported a similar instance during which she was kissed after reporting for duty, further affirming the pattern of abuse exhibited by the respondent.

Investigative Findings

The investigation, conducted by retired Justice Romulo S. Quimbo, concluded that the testimonies provided by the complainants were credible, consistent, and corroborated each other, leading to the identification of a pattern of sexual harassment. The complaints were also supported by witnesses, including Judge Santiago, who listened to the complainants shortly after the incidents occurred.

Respondent's Defense

In his defense, Judge de Asa vehemently denied the allegations, claiming they were concocted and motivated by malice, particularly from Atty. Buencamino, whom he accused of orchestrating the claims against him. He argued that no substantial evidence existed to support the claims of misconduct and presented witnesses who attested to his good character, reaffirming his dedication to his judicial responsibilities and adherence to duties.

Judicial Evaluation

In evaluating the evidence, the investigating justice observed that the respondent's defense did not effectively counter the testimonies of the complainants, and their accounts were deemed more compelling than the testimonies presented in support of Judge de A

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.