Title
Banas-Nograles vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 246328
Decision Date
Sep 10, 2019
COMELEC suspended 2019 elections for South Cotabato's First District, citing logistical issues. Supreme Court ruled suspension invalid, ordered proclamation of winning candidate Shirlyn BaAas-Nograles.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 202761)

Petitioners

Petitioners are Vice Mayor Shirlyn L. BaAas‑Nograles and numerous co‑petitioners (local officials and residents) who sought judicial relief from COMELEC’s suspension of the election for Representative of the First Legislative District of South Cotabato, including General Santos City, and sought proclamation of BaAas‑Nograles as the duly elected representative.

Respondent

The respondent is the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), represented by the Office of the Solicitor General in this proceeding, which promulgated Resolution No. 10524 dated April 11, 2019, suspending the scheduled May 13, 2019 election for Representative of the First Legislative District of South Cotabato and declaring votes for that position in the May 13 elections to be stray.

Key Dates

  • R.A. No. 11243 approved March 11, 2019; took effect April 4, 2019.
  • COMELEC issued Resolution No. 10524 on April 11, 2019.
  • May 13, 2019: scheduled national and local elections proceeded; votes were cast for the First District representative.
  • Multiple manifestations by BaAas‑Nograles were filed between May 24 and August 22, 2019.
  • Supreme Court resolution and disposition were rendered in the cited decision (decision date within the prompt is 2019).

Applicable Law

The decision applied the 1987 Constitution (particularly Article VI, Sections 7 and 8), Republic Act No. 11243 (reapportioning the First Legislative District of South Cotabato and creating the lone legislative district of General Santos City), R.A. No. 7166 (on date of elections), and Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, Section 5 (postponement of elections) as referenced by the parties and considered in the Court’s analysis.

Factual Antecedents

R.A. No. 11243 reapportioned South Cotabato’s First Legislative District to create a lone legislative district for General Santos City and directed that the reapportionment “commence in the next national and local elections after the effectivity of this Act.” The statute further instructed incumbents to continue representing their districts “until new representatives shall have been elected and qualified,” and directed COMELEC to promulgate implementing rules and regulations. Because R.A. 11243 took effect shortly before the May 13, 2019 elections, COMELEC issued Resolution No. 10524 asserting that electoral preparations were already configured in the automated election system and could not be modified in time, and thus suspended the election for Representative of the First Legislative District.

COMELEC Resolution No. 10524 (April 11, 2019)

COMELEC declared that the automated election system had already been configured to treat voters of the First Legislative District of South Cotabato as voting for a single Representative position; finding that reconfiguration could not be completed without jeopardizing preparations for other positions, COMELEC: (a) suspended the May 13, 2019 election for Representatives of the First Legislative District (including General Santos City) and treated any votes cast for that position as stray; (b) set the first regular election for the new Representatives of the First and Third Legislative Districts of South Cotabato “within six (6) months from May 13, 2019”; and (c) provided that incumbent Representatives would continue representing their districts “until noon of June 30, 2019.”

Contentions of Petitioners

Petitioners contended that COMELEC’s suspension violated R.A. 7166, which sets the regular election date for members of the House of Representatives on the second Monday of May. They argued that no exceptional circumstances warranted a special election under the postponement statute and that scheduling an election “within six months” violated R.A. 11243 because the reapportionment was intended to commence at the next regular national and local elections after the act’s effectivity (arguably the second Monday of May 2022). Petitioners further argued that declaring the May 13 votes stray would leave the First District unrepresented from July 1, 2019 until the special election, while allowing an incumbent to hold over beyond June 30, 2019 would unduly extend a term without election.

COMELEC’s Defense

COMELEC argued authority under Article IX‑C, Section 2(1) of the 1987 Constitution to enforce election laws and under BP 881, Section 5, to postpone elections for serious causes such as force majeure and analogous circumstances. COMELEC relied on logistical and operational impossibility—most pre‑election activities were already completed and electoral data could not be revised in the remaining 38 days—to justify postponement and to set a special election within six months. COMELEC also invoked its duty to ensure free, orderly and honest elections and interpreted R.A. 11243 as requiring implementation in the immediate next elections (2019).

Legal Issue Presented

The primary legal issue was whether COMELEC lawfully suspended the May 13, 2019 election for Representative of the First Legislative District of South Cotabato in light of R.A. 11243, R.A. 7166, BP 881, and the 1987 Constitution’s provisions on the timing of regular elections and terms of office.

Court’s Analysis — “Unless Otherwise Provided by Law”

The Court emphasized Article VI, Sections 7 and 8 of the 1987 Constitution: members of the House serve three‑year terms starting at noon on June 30 following their election, and regular elections are to be held on the second Monday of May “unless otherwise provided by law.” The Court construed “unless otherwise provided by law” to mean either (1) a law that specifically fixes a different election date, or (2) a law that delegates to COMELEC authority to set a different date. The Court found that R.A. 11243 neither fixed a date other than the second Monday of May nor delegated to COMELEC the authority to set a different date.

Court’s Analysis — Timing of Implementation of R.A. 11243

The Court interpreted Section 1 of R.A. 11243, which provided that reapportionment shall “commence in the next national and local elections after the effectivity of this Act,” to mean the next regular elections on the second Monday of May 2022 rather than the May 13, 2019 elections. The Court reasoned that Congress, having enacted the law when the election period had already begun, could

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.