Title
Baguio Central University vs. Gallente
Case
G.R. No. 188267
Decision Date
Dec 2, 2013
A university dean organized a competing review center using university resources, leading to his dismissal. Courts ruled the dismissal valid due to breach of trust but awarded nominal damages for procedural lapses.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 188267)

Applicable Law

The legal framework governing the dispute includes the 1987 Philippine Constitution and provisions of the Labor Code, specifically Article 282 concerning just causes for termination of employment, including loss of trust and confidence.

Factual Background

Ignacio Gallente was hired by BCU as an instructor in October 1991 and subsequently promoted to the position of Dean for the Colleges of Arts and Sciences and Public Administration. In February 2005, he established the GRC Review and Language Center, Inc., with BCU listed as its primary address. When BCU's President, Dr. Margarita Fernandez, raised concerns regarding Gallente's use of university resources and the establishment of the GRC, Gallente resigned in September 2005. He later filed a complaint for constructive dismissal, claiming he was coerced into resigning.

Initial Decisions

The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Gallente, finding that he was constructively dismissed and ordering BCU to pay various compensatory benefits. The decision was based on the conclusion that Gallente's resignation was not voluntary, and BCU failed to provide just cause for his termination.

National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) Ruling

Upon appeal, the NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter’s ruling, stating that BCU had valid grounds for dismissing Gallente based on loss of trust and confidence. The NLRC concluded that Gallente was competing with BCU's programs, which constituted a conflict of interest and warranted his dismissal. The NLRC held that actual damage need not be proven for loss of trust to be valid; the mere potential for betrayal was sufficient.

Court of Appeals (CA) Ruling

The Court of Appeals reversed the NLRC's decision and reinstated the Labor Arbiter's ruling, asserting that the NLRC failed to provide adequate justification for its findings. The CA maintained that BCU's claims of loss of trust were insufficient, especially since Gallente did not profit from the GRC, which failed to operate successfully.

Arguments of the Parties

BCU contended that Gallente's actions constituted a willful breach of the trust inherent in his managerial position, highlighting that he engaged in activities that conflicted with the interests of BCU. Gallente, however, argued that the dismissal was unfounded, maintaining that he had no intention to compete with BCU and asserting that he did not directly offer any review courses.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court granted BCU’s petition, reversing the CA's decision and reinstating the NLRC's ruling. It determined that Gallente held a position of trust and confidence as Dean, which mandated a higher standard of conduct. His actions in establishing the GRC and using BCU resources without authorization were deemed sufficient grounds for a loss of trust, regardless of whether BCU experienced actual financial damage.

Conclusion on Dismissal Validity

The Supreme Court held

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.