Title
People vs. Huang Zhen Hua
Case
G.R. No. 139301
Decision Date
Sep 29, 2004
Appellants Huang Zhen Hua and Jogy Lee were convicted for illegal drug possession. Huang was acquitted due to lack of evidence linking him to the drugs, while Lee's conviction was upheld as she shared joint possession with her partner. The search was deemed lawful, and evidence admissible.

Case Digest (G.R. No. 8765)

Facts:

  • Surveillance and Intelligence
    • PARAC operatives received a tip that Peter Chan, Henry Lao, appellants Lee and Huang were trafficking shabu; surveillance confirmed Lee and Lao cohabited and met Chan at restaurants and a hotel.
    • The suspects’ residences were identified at Cityland Condominium (Rooms 1245, 1247) and Pacific Grand Villa, Parañaque.
  • Search Warrants and Seizures
    • On October 29, 1996, Warrant No. 96-801 was served at Cityland: officers found 2 kg of shabu, production paraphernalia, and counterfeit‐card equipment.
    • On October 26, 1996, a raid at Furama Karaoke resulted in the death of Chan and Lao and seizure of 2 kg shabu from Lao’s car. The same day, Warrant No. 96-802 was executed at Pacific Grand Villa: after knock, interpreter assistance, and Lee’s voluntary opening of the door, officers found in the master bedroom two 1-kg bags of shabu, a bottle and canister with shabu, paraphernalia, and personal documents.
  • Post-Seizure Procedures and Prosecution
    • Inventory and arrest affidavits were made; exhibits were delivered to the PNP Crime Laboratory, whose report confirmed methamphetamine hydrochloride.
    • An Information was filed charging Lee and Huang with violation of Sec. 16, RA 6425; they were arraigned on November 29, 1996, and pleaded not guilty.

Issues:

  • Issues Concerning Huang Zhen Hua
    • Did the prosecution prove beyond reasonable doubt his actual or constructive possession of shabu or conspiracy with Lao and Chan?
  • Issues Concerning Jogy Lee
    • Were the search and seizure lawful under the “knock and announce” rule, warrant requirements, and due-process (including interpreter assistance)?
    • Was the evidence of contraband planted, and did Lee’s lack of English comprehension vitiate her knowledge of the shabu?
    • Was there probable cause for her warrantless arrest and for seizing items not described in the warrant?

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.